The Paradoxes of the Body in Philip Roth’s Last Novels

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Political Science Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1080/10457097.2023.2196224
L. Trepanier
{"title":"The Paradoxes of the Body in Philip Roth’s Last Novels","authors":"L. Trepanier","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2023.2196224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article adopts the phenomenological approach of Merleau-Ponty to explore how the body is both a source of hope and betrayal for the protagonists’ aspirations in Philip Roth’s last four novels: Everyman, Indignation, The Humbling, and Nemesis. When the characters accept the reality of their bodies, it leads them to a sense of responsibility in their communities; when they reject the truth of their bodies, it leads them to social isolation and existential despair. From these novels, Roth’s characters point toward an understanding of community that is corporeal and, for it to be healthy, demands its members recognize the realities of it.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"130 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2023.2196224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article adopts the phenomenological approach of Merleau-Ponty to explore how the body is both a source of hope and betrayal for the protagonists’ aspirations in Philip Roth’s last four novels: Everyman, Indignation, The Humbling, and Nemesis. When the characters accept the reality of their bodies, it leads them to a sense of responsibility in their communities; when they reject the truth of their bodies, it leads them to social isolation and existential despair. From these novels, Roth’s characters point toward an understanding of community that is corporeal and, for it to be healthy, demands its members recognize the realities of it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲利普·罗斯最后小说中的身体悖论
摘要本文采用梅洛-庞蒂的现象学方法,探讨菲利普·罗斯最后四部小说《普通人》、《愤怒》、《谦卑》和《复仇》中,身体既是希望的源泉,又是背叛的源泉。当角色接受自己身体的现实时,他们就会对自己的社区产生责任感;当他们拒绝自己身体的真相时,就会导致社会孤立和生存绝望。从这些小说中,罗斯笔下的人物指向了一种对社区的理解,这种理解是物质的,要想让社区健康,就要求社区成员认识到它的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
期刊最新文献
Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? by Najeeb T. Haddad, Cascade Books, Publication Date: 2023 Conversation as Political Education Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science , by Alex Priou, Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 184 pp., ISBN 978-0-88146-914-1, Publication Date: 2023 The Politics of Suicide: Miasma and Katharmos in Plato’s Political Thought “Worse than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism,” by Erwin Chemerinsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1