Development and Validation of the Barriers to Care Scale: Assessing Access to Care among Canadian Armed Forces Health Care Providers

Q2 Social Sciences Military Behavioral Health Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1080/21635781.2021.2004958
C. Frank, Jennifer Born
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Barriers to Care Scale: Assessing Access to Care among Canadian Armed Forces Health Care Providers","authors":"C. Frank, Jennifer Born","doi":"10.1080/21635781.2021.2004958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Military health care providers (HCPs) under-access health services. Measures aimed at assessing barriers to care are either limited in scope, do not address barriers to physical healthcare, or are not grounded in theory. The current study developed and validated a measure of barriers to care based on an existing theoretical framework. Forty focus groups were conducted with 182 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) HCPs across Canada focusing on barriers to accessing care. Focus group content was used to develop 52 unique barrier items. The Barriers to Care scale was completed by 1033 CAF HCPs. The sample was randomly split so that both an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) could be conducted. The identified factors were correlated with intent to access care to assess concurrent validity. Results of the EFA and CFA (CFI = .84; TLI = .84; SRMR = .08; RMSEA = .07) suggested an eight-factor model. The alphas of the eight subscales were excellent (> .85). All subscales significantly and negatively correlated with intent to access care. The findings suggest a promising first step toward creating a theory-based, valid, and reliable measure for assessing barriers to care.","PeriodicalId":37012,"journal":{"name":"Military Behavioral Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"287 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2021.2004958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Military health care providers (HCPs) under-access health services. Measures aimed at assessing barriers to care are either limited in scope, do not address barriers to physical healthcare, or are not grounded in theory. The current study developed and validated a measure of barriers to care based on an existing theoretical framework. Forty focus groups were conducted with 182 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) HCPs across Canada focusing on barriers to accessing care. Focus group content was used to develop 52 unique barrier items. The Barriers to Care scale was completed by 1033 CAF HCPs. The sample was randomly split so that both an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) could be conducted. The identified factors were correlated with intent to access care to assess concurrent validity. Results of the EFA and CFA (CFI = .84; TLI = .84; SRMR = .08; RMSEA = .07) suggested an eight-factor model. The alphas of the eight subscales were excellent (> .85). All subscales significantly and negatively correlated with intent to access care. The findings suggest a promising first step toward creating a theory-based, valid, and reliable measure for assessing barriers to care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理障碍量表的开发和验证:评估加拿大武装部队卫生保健提供者获得护理的机会
军事卫生保健提供者(HCPs)缺乏卫生服务。旨在评估保健障碍的措施要么范围有限,要么不涉及实际保健障碍,要么没有理论依据。目前的研究在现有理论框架的基础上开发并验证了护理障碍的衡量标准。40个焦点小组与加拿大各地的182名加拿大武装部队(CAF) HCPs进行了讨论,重点关注获得医疗服务的障碍。使用焦点小组内容开发52个独特的障碍项目。1033名CAF医护人员完成了护理障碍量表。样本随机分割,进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。确定的因素与获得护理的意图相关,以评估并发效度。EFA和CFA结果(CFI = .84;Tli = .84;SRMR = .08;RMSEA = .07)建议采用八因素模型。8个分量表α均为优(>.85)。所有分量表均与获得护理的意向呈显著负相关。研究结果表明,朝着建立一种基于理论的、有效的、可靠的措施来评估护理障碍迈出了有希望的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Behavioral Health
Military Behavioral Health Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Adjusting to a Partners’ Changed Appearance Following Military Combat-Related Appearance-Altering Injuries: The Challenges of Looking “Different” and How Life Continues Desired Employment and Local Social Support: The Strongest Predictors for Wellbeing Outcomes Amongst the Partners of Australian Military Members Implementation of a Supervisor-Led Resilience Training Extension in the Royal Military College Resilient Coping and the Psychometric Properties of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) Among Healthy Young Men at Military Call-up Importance of Military Identity in Understanding the Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Adverse Family Functioning for Post-9/11 Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1