The age of absorptive roots impacts root-adjacent microbial composition in grapevines

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Phytobiomes Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1094/pbiomes-11-22-0078-sc
Meredith J. Persico, Suzanne M. Fleishman, D. Eissenstat, Terrence H. Bell, M. Centinari
{"title":"The age of absorptive roots impacts root-adjacent microbial composition in grapevines","authors":"Meredith J. Persico, Suzanne M. Fleishman, D. Eissenstat, Terrence H. Bell, M. Centinari","doi":"10.1094/pbiomes-11-22-0078-sc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In grapevine, metabolic activity of absorptive roots changes rapidly as roots age, but it is unclear if nearby microbial assemblages shift as well. Here, we investigated whether first-order root age impacts bacterial and fungal variation adjacent to the root surface, and if root age should be integrated into future studies on root functional traits and associated microbes. We hypothesized that microbial diversity and composition would differ between young (≤ 11 days old) and old (11.5 – 40 days old) first-order roots due to expected differences in metabolism over root lifespan (i.e., higher metabolism in young roots). Overall, we found that microbial composition was distinct between young and old absorptive roots, with stronger evidence at the phylum and ASV taxonomic levels for fungi (p = 0.003 and p = 0.038, respectively) than bacteria (p = 0.082 and p = 0.129, respectively). Furthermore, we identified differentially abundant fungal and bacterial ASVs in young and old roots that related to expected differences in root function, including instances of microbes previously described as copiotrophs more abundant adjacent to young roots and microbes described as oligotrophs and saprotrophs more abundant adjacent to old roots. In contrast to the distinct shifts in microbial composition, there was little evidence of shifts in alpha diversity (i.e., observed ASVs and Shannon diversity) between young and old roots. Our study suggests that future work on the impacts of root functional traits on localized microbial composition may improve results interpretation and reduce some variation by accounting for root age at sampling.","PeriodicalId":48504,"journal":{"name":"Phytobiomes Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytobiomes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-11-22-0078-sc","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In grapevine, metabolic activity of absorptive roots changes rapidly as roots age, but it is unclear if nearby microbial assemblages shift as well. Here, we investigated whether first-order root age impacts bacterial and fungal variation adjacent to the root surface, and if root age should be integrated into future studies on root functional traits and associated microbes. We hypothesized that microbial diversity and composition would differ between young (≤ 11 days old) and old (11.5 – 40 days old) first-order roots due to expected differences in metabolism over root lifespan (i.e., higher metabolism in young roots). Overall, we found that microbial composition was distinct between young and old absorptive roots, with stronger evidence at the phylum and ASV taxonomic levels for fungi (p = 0.003 and p = 0.038, respectively) than bacteria (p = 0.082 and p = 0.129, respectively). Furthermore, we identified differentially abundant fungal and bacterial ASVs in young and old roots that related to expected differences in root function, including instances of microbes previously described as copiotrophs more abundant adjacent to young roots and microbes described as oligotrophs and saprotrophs more abundant adjacent to old roots. In contrast to the distinct shifts in microbial composition, there was little evidence of shifts in alpha diversity (i.e., observed ASVs and Shannon diversity) between young and old roots. Our study suggests that future work on the impacts of root functional traits on localized microbial composition may improve results interpretation and reduce some variation by accounting for root age at sampling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄吸收根的年龄对根附近微生物组成的影响
在葡萄藤中,吸收根的代谢活性随着根的老化而迅速变化,但尚不清楚附近的微生物群落是否也发生了变化。在这里,我们调查了一阶根龄是否影响根表面附近的细菌和真菌变异,以及根龄是否应纳入未来对根功能性状和相关微生物的研究。我们假设,由于根寿命期间代谢的预期差异(即年轻根的代谢更高),年轻(≤11天)和年老(11.5–40天)的一级根之间的微生物多样性和组成会有所不同。总的来说,我们发现年轻和年老吸收根之间的微生物组成是不同的,在真菌的门和ASV分类水平上(分别为p=0.003和p=0.038)比细菌(分别为0.082和0.129)有更强的证据。此外,我们在幼根和老根中鉴定出了与根功能预期差异相关的差异丰富的真菌和细菌ASV,包括先前被描述为在幼根附近更丰富的副营养菌的微生物,以及被描述为与老根附近更丰富的寡营养菌和腐生菌的微生物。与微生物组成的明显变化相反,几乎没有证据表明年轻根和老根之间的α多样性(即观察到的ASV和Shannon多样性)发生了变化。我们的研究表明,未来关于根系功能性状对局部微生物组成影响的工作可能会通过考虑取样时的根系年龄来改善结果解释并减少一些变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetically similar Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strains and associated phage display phenotypic and genotypic variation across 35 years Abiotic stress reorganizes rhizosphere and endosphere network structure of Sorghum bicolor A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects Fungal communities shift with soybean cyst nematode abundance in soils The root-endophytic microbiome shifts under drought in high-performing sorghum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1