Emotional Experiences of Vulnerable Groups During COVID-19

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Journal of Psychology Open Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1024/2673-8627/a000038
Ilina Nacheva, Tsvetelina Panchelieva, D. Bakalova
{"title":"Emotional Experiences of Vulnerable Groups During COVID-19","authors":"Ilina Nacheva, Tsvetelina Panchelieva, D. Bakalova","doi":"10.1024/2673-8627/a000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Introduction: The study focuses on the prevalent emotions and specific experiences of three particularly vulnerable groups in the Bulgarian pandemic context. The target groups include working parents with small children (0–12 years), people who lost their jobs because of the COVID-19 crisis, and people with chronic diseases. Methods: To determine the experiences and sources of stress, we conducted semistructured in-depth calendar interviews ( N = 45) in late 2021. Narratives of representatives of the three groups generated authentic retrospective textual data, amounting to 221,883 words. To identify prevalent emotions in their speech, we did an automated qualitative data analysis of the three text corpuses and built a 10-category dictionary for basic emotions in accordance with Carroll Izard’s (1991) differential emotions theory, including synonyms, similar, and related words. Results: Content analysis showed that the most prominent emotion was fear, followed by interest, sadness and enjoyment. Lack of consistent and reliable information, the feeling of uncertainty, fear of the unknown and constant changes in the restrictive measures were significant sources of stress for all groups included in the study. At the same time, the three vulnerable groups differed both in the sources and in the content of the expressed fears. Discussion: Both practical and future research implications are discussed. Perhaps, these findings are valid for other types of crises and can serve as a central line for elaborating specific measures and crisis communication strategies targeting concrete vulnerable groups in society. Conclusion: Although the prevalent emotion in the narratives was fear, both the sources and the content of the fears were very different for the three groups. Findings suggest that specific measures and policies for the different vulnerable groups might be more effective in case of crisis.","PeriodicalId":29838,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The study focuses on the prevalent emotions and specific experiences of three particularly vulnerable groups in the Bulgarian pandemic context. The target groups include working parents with small children (0–12 years), people who lost their jobs because of the COVID-19 crisis, and people with chronic diseases. Methods: To determine the experiences and sources of stress, we conducted semistructured in-depth calendar interviews ( N = 45) in late 2021. Narratives of representatives of the three groups generated authentic retrospective textual data, amounting to 221,883 words. To identify prevalent emotions in their speech, we did an automated qualitative data analysis of the three text corpuses and built a 10-category dictionary for basic emotions in accordance with Carroll Izard’s (1991) differential emotions theory, including synonyms, similar, and related words. Results: Content analysis showed that the most prominent emotion was fear, followed by interest, sadness and enjoyment. Lack of consistent and reliable information, the feeling of uncertainty, fear of the unknown and constant changes in the restrictive measures were significant sources of stress for all groups included in the study. At the same time, the three vulnerable groups differed both in the sources and in the content of the expressed fears. Discussion: Both practical and future research implications are discussed. Perhaps, these findings are valid for other types of crises and can serve as a central line for elaborating specific measures and crisis communication strategies targeting concrete vulnerable groups in society. Conclusion: Although the prevalent emotion in the narratives was fear, both the sources and the content of the fears were very different for the three groups. Findings suggest that specific measures and policies for the different vulnerable groups might be more effective in case of crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎期间弱势群体的情感体验
摘要:引言:该研究重点关注保加利亚疫情背景下三个特别脆弱群体的普遍情绪和具体经历。目标群体包括有幼儿(0-12岁)的在职父母、因新冠肺炎危机而失业的人以及患有慢性病的人。方法:为了确定压力的经历和来源,我们在2021年末进行了半结构化的深入日历访谈(N=45)。三组代表的叙述产生了真实的回顾性文本数据,总计221883个单词。为了识别他们言语中的普遍情绪,我们对三个文本语料库进行了自动定性数据分析,并根据Carroll Izard(1991)的差异情绪理论建立了一个基本情绪的10类词典,包括同义词、相似词和相关词。结果:内容分析显示,最突出的情绪是恐惧,其次是兴趣、悲伤和享受。缺乏一致和可靠的信息、不确定感、对未知的恐惧以及限制措施的不断变化是研究中所有群体压力的重要来源。与此同时,三个弱势群体表达的恐惧在来源和内容上都有所不同。讨论:讨论了实际和未来的研究意义。也许,这些发现对其他类型的危机是有效的,可以作为制定针对社会中具体弱势群体的具体措施和危机沟通战略的中心线。结论:尽管叙事中的普遍情绪是恐惧,但三组人的恐惧来源和内容都有很大差异。调查结果表明,在发生危机时,针对不同弱势群体的具体措施和政策可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Psychology Open
European Journal of Psychology Open PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Job Demands and Job Control Quality Factors That Influence the Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs Abstracts of the 18th European Congress of Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1