Assessment of the functional movement screen and injuries in gymnasts

Q4 Health Professions Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.18176/archmeddeporte.00085
M. Vernetta-Santana, Alicia Salas-Morillas, J. López-Bedoya
{"title":"Assessment of the functional movement screen and injuries in gymnasts","authors":"M. Vernetta-Santana, Alicia Salas-Morillas, J. López-Bedoya","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify possible differences in movement quality through the functional movement screen (FMS) between injured and non-injured adolescent acrobatic gymnasts in the last season. Method: descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study involving 20 adolescent female gymnasts divided into two groups, one composed of 9 gymnasts who had suffered an injury in the last season (14,7±1,56) and the other composed of 11 gymnasts who had not suffered any injury (13,9±2,25). The FMS battery was used, consisting of seven tests: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability in push-ups, trunk rotational stability. Results: Of the nine gymnasts who had sustained an injury, 66.6% were located in the lower limb, ankles and knees. The results of the total functional assessment of FMS using the Mann Whitney U statistic for independent samples showed no statistically significant differences between groups (Z = -.393; p > 0.05), with the average range of FMS being similar in both cases (10.05 and 11.06 in injured and non-injured gymnasts respectively). It also showed the absence of significant differences in each of the tests of the battery, and no relationship was found through Spearman’s R statistic, between the overall FMS score and the group of injured gymnasts. Conclusion: The results of the FMS total score were slightly higher in gymnasts who were not injured last season, as well as slightly better in all the lower body tests, hence the FMS can be used as a preventive programmed to detect possible deficiencies.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify possible differences in movement quality through the functional movement screen (FMS) between injured and non-injured adolescent acrobatic gymnasts in the last season. Method: descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study involving 20 adolescent female gymnasts divided into two groups, one composed of 9 gymnasts who had suffered an injury in the last season (14,7±1,56) and the other composed of 11 gymnasts who had not suffered any injury (13,9±2,25). The FMS battery was used, consisting of seven tests: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability in push-ups, trunk rotational stability. Results: Of the nine gymnasts who had sustained an injury, 66.6% were located in the lower limb, ankles and knees. The results of the total functional assessment of FMS using the Mann Whitney U statistic for independent samples showed no statistically significant differences between groups (Z = -.393; p > 0.05), with the average range of FMS being similar in both cases (10.05 and 11.06 in injured and non-injured gymnasts respectively). It also showed the absence of significant differences in each of the tests of the battery, and no relationship was found through Spearman’s R statistic, between the overall FMS score and the group of injured gymnasts. Conclusion: The results of the FMS total score were slightly higher in gymnasts who were not injured last season, as well as slightly better in all the lower body tests, hence the FMS can be used as a preventive programmed to detect possible deficiencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体操运动员运动功能障碍与损伤的评估
目的:通过功能性运动屏幕(FMS)分析上个赛季青少年杂技体操受伤与非受伤运动员在运动质量上的差异。方法:对20名青少年女体操运动员进行描述性、对比性、横断面研究,将其分为两组,一组为上赛季曾受伤的9名运动员(14,7±1,56),另一组为未受伤的11名运动员(13,9±2,25)。采用FMS电池,包括7个测试:深蹲、跨栏步、直线弓步、肩部活动度、主动直腿抬高、俯卧撑躯干稳定性、躯干旋转稳定性。结果:9例体操运动员中,66.6%的损伤部位位于下肢、踝关节和膝关节。使用Mann Whitney U统计量对独立样本进行FMS总功能评估的结果显示,组间差异无统计学意义(Z = - 0.393;p > 0.05),两种情况下FMS的平均范围相似(受伤和未受伤的运动员分别为10.05和11.06)。它还显示,在电池的每个测试中没有显着差异,并且通过Spearman 's R统计没有发现FMS总分与受伤体操运动员组之间的关系。结论:在上赛季未受伤的体操运动员中,FMS总分得分略高,在所有下体测试中得分略好,因此FMS可以作为一种预防程序来发现可能存在的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of maximal oxygen uptake pre- and post-COVID-19 in elite footballers in Argentina A systematic review on the application of Aikido as a psychosomatic tool in therapeutic setting (Part I) The pre-participation physical evaluation: fact or fiction? Adductor functionality and strength in high-level rink hockey players Hemodynamic and motion demands of soccer referees: a comparison between series A and B of the State Championship of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1