Human Rights and Health Care

V. Stambolović
{"title":"Human Rights and Health Care","authors":"V. Stambolović","doi":"10.47363/jmhc/2019(1)102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of Modernity, the access to health care provided by official medicine became one of the established human rights. It appeared however that in contributing to the human right to the “highest attainable status of health” official medicine was violating patients’ human rights. The source of that violation was embedded in the fundamental concepts of Modern medicine: objectivism, reductionism and mechanical determinism. Namely, these three concepts led to the development of medical theory and practice within which technology was everything and the treated human being - “nothing”. In the dawn of Post-modernity the other approach to treatment is emerging. Instead on a Cartesian , it is based on a Holographic paradigm. Fundamental concepts of that approach are: objective/subjective, holism and personal responsibility. These concepts are enabling treated human beings do develop into co-creators of their health. In addition, they are emphasizing that the respect of human rights which we could name Postmodern should be the new conditio sine qua non of a professional health care","PeriodicalId":93468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medicine and healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medicine and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jmhc/2019(1)102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of Modernity, the access to health care provided by official medicine became one of the established human rights. It appeared however that in contributing to the human right to the “highest attainable status of health” official medicine was violating patients’ human rights. The source of that violation was embedded in the fundamental concepts of Modern medicine: objectivism, reductionism and mechanical determinism. Namely, these three concepts led to the development of medical theory and practice within which technology was everything and the treated human being - “nothing”. In the dawn of Post-modernity the other approach to treatment is emerging. Instead on a Cartesian , it is based on a Holographic paradigm. Fundamental concepts of that approach are: objective/subjective, holism and personal responsibility. These concepts are enabling treated human beings do develop into co-creators of their health. In addition, they are emphasizing that the respect of human rights which we could name Postmodern should be the new conditio sine qua non of a professional health care
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权和保健
在现代性时代,获得官方医疗提供的医疗保健成为既定的人权之一。然而,在促进享有“可达到的最高健康状况”的人权方面,官方药物似乎侵犯了患者的人权。这种违背的根源植根于现代医学的基本概念:客观主义、还原论和机械决定论。也就是说,这三个概念导致了医学理论和实践的发展,在这个理论和实践中,技术就是一切,被治疗的人——“什么都没有”。在后现代性的黎明,另一种治疗方法正在出现。相反,它是基于笛卡尔,基于全息范式。这种方法的基本概念是:客观/主观、整体主义和个人责任。这些概念使经过治疗的人类能够发展成为健康的共同创造者。此外,他们强调,尊重人权(我们可以称之为后现代)应该是专业医疗保健的新的必要条件
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Thermal Dry Cupping Therapy in Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Omani Patients Available, Effective, Cheap, and Easy to Prepare with Safe Reputation Among Community, Fenugreek: A Short Commentary “Index Case of Multiresistant Ochrobactrum Anthropi in an Immunocompetent Postpartum Female with Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Unique Case at a Tertiary Care Centre in India” Evans Syndrome in a Patient with Auto Immune Thyroiditis – A Rare Association Post COVID-19 Manifestations: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1