Statistical valuation of cognitive load level hemodynamics from functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals

Farzana Khanam , A.B.M. Aowlad Hossain , Mohiuddin Ahmad
{"title":"Statistical valuation of cognitive load level hemodynamics from functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals","authors":"Farzana Khanam ,&nbsp;A.B.M. Aowlad Hossain ,&nbsp;Mohiuddin Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human cognitive load level assessment is a challenging issue in the field of functional brain imaging. This work aims to study different cognitive load levels statistically from brain hemodynamics. Since the functional brain activities can be evaluated by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a renowned fNIRS dataset is considered for this work. The dataset contains fNIRS data of three types of <em>n</em>-back tasks (0-back, 2-back, and 3-back) of twenty-six healthy volunteers. The fNIRS signals were pre-processed and separated according to the tasks and trials. The mean changes of oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO<sub>2</sub>) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (dHb) are calculated from each trial corresponding to the tasks and tested for significant inference among three levels utilizing analysis of variance (ANOVA). From the outcomes of the ANOVA (<span><math><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0.005</mn></math></span>), two significant channels (AF7 (frontal) and C3h (motor)) were figured out. The significance of these two channels was further justified using the property consistency test by three different time intervals of hemodynamics inside the total task period. The latter result also explored the functional pattern of the hemodynamics of AF7 and C3h positions. Moreover, two-level cognitive load (due to easy i.e., 0-back test and hard i.e., 2-back and 3-back task) is classified using support vector machine and found classification accuracy in average 73.40%±0.076 for HbO<sub>2</sub> data and 71.48%±0.061 for dHb data. The study signposts the collective role played by both fNIRS signals and statistical valuation of functioning cognitive load efficacy to use fNIRS as a cognitive load assessment biomarker.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000048/pdfft?md5=aa54a941fe48a7792670e1f58a0fb672&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528622000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human cognitive load level assessment is a challenging issue in the field of functional brain imaging. This work aims to study different cognitive load levels statistically from brain hemodynamics. Since the functional brain activities can be evaluated by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a renowned fNIRS dataset is considered for this work. The dataset contains fNIRS data of three types of n-back tasks (0-back, 2-back, and 3-back) of twenty-six healthy volunteers. The fNIRS signals were pre-processed and separated according to the tasks and trials. The mean changes of oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (dHb) are calculated from each trial corresponding to the tasks and tested for significant inference among three levels utilizing analysis of variance (ANOVA). From the outcomes of the ANOVA (p<0.005), two significant channels (AF7 (frontal) and C3h (motor)) were figured out. The significance of these two channels was further justified using the property consistency test by three different time intervals of hemodynamics inside the total task period. The latter result also explored the functional pattern of the hemodynamics of AF7 and C3h positions. Moreover, two-level cognitive load (due to easy i.e., 0-back test and hard i.e., 2-back and 3-back task) is classified using support vector machine and found classification accuracy in average 73.40%±0.076 for HbO2 data and 71.48%±0.061 for dHb data. The study signposts the collective role played by both fNIRS signals and statistical valuation of functioning cognitive load efficacy to use fNIRS as a cognitive load assessment biomarker.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性近红外光谱信号对认知负荷水平血流动力学的统计评价
人类认知负荷水平评估是脑功能成像领域的一个具有挑战性的问题。本研究旨在通过脑血流动力学统计研究不同认知负荷水平。由于功能性脑活动可以通过功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)来评估,因此本研究考虑了一个著名的近红外光谱数据集。该数据集包含26名健康志愿者的三种n-back任务(0-back、2-back和3-back)的近红外光谱数据。根据任务和试验对近红外光谱信号进行预处理和分离。从每个试验对应的任务中计算含氧血红蛋白(HbO2)和脱氧血红蛋白(dHb)的平均变化,并利用方差分析(ANOVA)检验三个水平之间的显著推断。从方差分析(p<0.005)的结果中,我们发现了两个显著通道(AF7(额叶)和C3h(运动))。在整个任务周期内,通过三个不同时间间隔的血流动力学特性一致性测试,进一步证明了这两个通道的重要性。后者的结果还探讨了AF7和C3h位置血流动力学的功能模式。此外,利用支持向量机对两级认知负荷(容易即0回测试和难即2回和3回测试)进行分类,发现HbO2数据的平均分类准确率为73.40%±0.076,dHb数据的平均分类准确率为71.48%±0.061。该研究表明,fNIRS信号和功能性认知负荷效能的统计评估共同发挥作用,将fNIRS作为认知负荷评估的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in neurodegenerative diseases Topic modeling of neuropsychiatric diseases related to gut microbiota and gut brain axis using artificial intelligence based BERTopic model on PubMed abstracts Brain network analysis in Parkinson's disease patients based on graph theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1