Impact of opioid free Anaesthesia versus opioid Anaesthesia on the immediate postoperative oxygenation after bariatric surgery: a prospective observational study

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.56126/73.3.15
Lieselot Geerts, Hugo Carvalho, Eliza Jarahyan, J. Mulier
{"title":"Impact of opioid free Anaesthesia versus opioid Anaesthesia on the immediate postoperative oxygenation after bariatric surgery: a prospective observational study","authors":"Lieselot Geerts, Hugo Carvalho, Eliza Jarahyan, J. Mulier","doi":"10.56126/73.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Opioid induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a preventable aetiology of postoperative respiratory depression with 85% of the episodes taking place in the first 24 postoperative hours. Due to altered respiratory functional metrics and frequently coexisting comorbidities, obese patients are at a particularly higher risk for such complications. The present study aimed to assess if an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was associated with a reduced immediate postoperative OIRD when compared to Opiod-based anesthesia (OA).\n\nMethods: Obese patients presenting for bariatric surgery were consecutively included in a non-randomized fashion. Lung protective ventilation strategies applied in both groups. In the OA group, Sufentanil was used for intraoperative analgesia in a liberal fashion. In the OFA group, patients received a pre-induction dexmedetomidine loading, followed by a lidocaine, ketamine and dexmedetomidine bolus immediately before induction, further maintained throughout the intraoperative period. Plethysmographic saturations were obtained before induction as well as after extubation and in the Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Opioid requirement and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting incidence were similarly registered.\n\nResults: Thirty-four patients were included in the OFA group, and 30 in the OA group. No significant anthropometric and comorbidity differences were found between both groups. OFA patients had significantly lower pre-induction saturations after dexmedetomidine loading. No difference was found for post-extubation saturations as well as well as pre-PACU discharge. The need for supplemental oxygen at the PACU was higher in the OA group. Opioid requirement and cumulative consumption (MEDs) were significantly higher with OA. Conclusion: OFA was not associated with significant postoperative saturation changes but led to a lower need of postoperative supplemental oxygen therapy. OA led to higher opioid rescue need. No fatal respiratory complications were registered in both groups in the immediate postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/73.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioid induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a preventable aetiology of postoperative respiratory depression with 85% of the episodes taking place in the first 24 postoperative hours. Due to altered respiratory functional metrics and frequently coexisting comorbidities, obese patients are at a particularly higher risk for such complications. The present study aimed to assess if an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was associated with a reduced immediate postoperative OIRD when compared to Opiod-based anesthesia (OA). Methods: Obese patients presenting for bariatric surgery were consecutively included in a non-randomized fashion. Lung protective ventilation strategies applied in both groups. In the OA group, Sufentanil was used for intraoperative analgesia in a liberal fashion. In the OFA group, patients received a pre-induction dexmedetomidine loading, followed by a lidocaine, ketamine and dexmedetomidine bolus immediately before induction, further maintained throughout the intraoperative period. Plethysmographic saturations were obtained before induction as well as after extubation and in the Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Opioid requirement and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting incidence were similarly registered. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the OFA group, and 30 in the OA group. No significant anthropometric and comorbidity differences were found between both groups. OFA patients had significantly lower pre-induction saturations after dexmedetomidine loading. No difference was found for post-extubation saturations as well as well as pre-PACU discharge. The need for supplemental oxygen at the PACU was higher in the OA group. Opioid requirement and cumulative consumption (MEDs) were significantly higher with OA. Conclusion: OFA was not associated with significant postoperative saturation changes but led to a lower need of postoperative supplemental oxygen therapy. OA led to higher opioid rescue need. No fatal respiratory complications were registered in both groups in the immediate postoperative period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无阿片类药物麻醉与阿片类药物麻醉对减肥手术后立即氧合的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究
引言:阿片类药物诱导的呼吸抑制(OIRD)是一种可预防的术后呼吸抑制病因,85%的发作发生在术后24小时内。由于呼吸功能指标的改变和经常共存的合并症,肥胖患者发生此类并发症的风险特别高。本研究旨在评估与基于阿片类药物的麻醉(OA)相比,无阿片类物质麻醉(OFA)是否与术后立即OIRD减少有关。方法:以非随机方式连续纳入接受减肥手术的肥胖患者。两组均采用肺保护性通气策略。OA组术中镇痛采用舒芬太尼。在OFA组中,患者在诱导前接受右美托咪定负荷,然后在诱导前立即接受利多卡因、氯胺酮和右美托咪定推注,并在整个术中期间进一步维持。在诱导前、拔管后和麻醉后护理室(PACU)中获得Plethymographic饱和度。阿片类药物需求和术后恶心呕吐的发生率也有相似的记录。结果:OFA组34例,OA组30例。两组之间没有发现显著的人体测量和共病差异。OFA患者在右美托咪定负荷后诱导前饱和度显著降低。拔管后的饱和度和PACU前的出院没有发现差异。OA组对PACU补充氧气的需求更高。OA患者的阿片类药物需求量和累积消耗量(MEDs)显著增加。结论:OFA与术后饱和度的显著变化无关,但可降低术后补充氧气治疗的需求。OA导致更高的阿片类药物救援需求。两组患者术后即刻均未出现致命的呼吸道并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
期刊最新文献
Long-term cognitive dysfunction after COVID ARDS Trends in female authorship in Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica from 2005 to 2021 General anesthesia for maternal surgery during pregnancy: dogmas, myths and evidence, a narrative review Clinical relevance of nocebo effects in anesthesia practice: a narrative review Gender equality and equity in anaesthesia research: Why are we still talking about numbers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1