EMU: An Italian perspective

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS PSL Quarterly Review Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI:10.13133/2037-3643_72.288_2
R. Masera
{"title":"EMU: An Italian perspective","authors":"R. Masera","doi":"10.13133/2037-3643_72.288_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers an Italian perspective on the creation and evolution of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), which were and continue to be politically driven processes. European political leaders were responsible not for design defects but for a fundamental fault in execution: an original sin that continues to undermine the workings of the EMU. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, the Maastricht criteria and a rapid convergence process towards political union as the counterpart to the EMU were a viable framework. This consistent time path was not respected when the euro was created: the participation of Italy in 1999 and of Greece in 2001 did not satisfy the condition of prior fundamental convergence, notably in terms of public finance. The currency without a state, the lack of adjustment, and insufficient structural reforms imparted a deflationary bias, heightened the risks of the sovereign/bank nexus, and led to a wrong policy mix. In spite of significant steps to correct the system, current flaws continue to represent a major drawback to improving the resilience of the system . JEL codes : E42, E52, E61, F33, F34, F45, H63","PeriodicalId":44488,"journal":{"name":"PSL Quarterly Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSL Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643_72.288_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper offers an Italian perspective on the creation and evolution of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), which were and continue to be politically driven processes. European political leaders were responsible not for design defects but for a fundamental fault in execution: an original sin that continues to undermine the workings of the EMU. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, the Maastricht criteria and a rapid convergence process towards political union as the counterpart to the EMU were a viable framework. This consistent time path was not respected when the euro was created: the participation of Italy in 1999 and of Greece in 2001 did not satisfy the condition of prior fundamental convergence, notably in terms of public finance. The currency without a state, the lack of adjustment, and insufficient structural reforms imparted a deflationary bias, heightened the risks of the sovereign/bank nexus, and led to a wrong policy mix. In spite of significant steps to correct the system, current flaws continue to represent a major drawback to improving the resilience of the system . JEL codes : E42, E52, E61, F33, F34, F45, H63
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMU:意大利视角
本文提供了意大利对欧洲经济和货币联盟(EMU)的创建和演变的看法,这是并将继续是政治驱动的过程。欧洲政治领导人的责任不在于设计缺陷,而在于执行上的根本失误:这一原罪继续破坏着欧洲货币联盟的运作。与普遍的看法相反,马斯特里赫特标准和朝着与欧洲货币联盟相对应的政治联盟的迅速趋同进程是一个可行的框架。欧元创立时,这种一致的时间路径并没有得到尊重:1999年意大利和2001年希腊的加入,都没有满足事先基本趋同的条件,尤其是在公共财政方面。没有政府的货币、缺乏调整和不充分的结构性改革导致了通缩倾向,加剧了主权/银行关系的风险,并导致了错误的政策组合。尽管采取了重大步骤来纠正系统,但目前的缺陷仍然是提高系统弹性的主要缺点。JEL代码:E42、E52、E61、F33、F34、F45、H63
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foreword: A debate on the future of economic policy Employment dynamics, increasing returns and Marx’s falling rate of profit The European industrial challenge and the Italian NRRP Major exchange rates and value-added exports Editorial: Italy’s “Charter of Workers’ Rights” turns fifty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1