Application of soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and their combination for prediction of soil classes using decision tree model

Desert Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.22059/JDESERT.2019.72449
M. Shamsabadi, I. Esfandiarpour-Borujeni, H. Shirani, M. Salehi
{"title":"Application of soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and their combination for prediction of soil classes using decision tree model","authors":"M. Shamsabadi, I. Esfandiarpour-Borujeni, H. Shirani, M. Salehi","doi":"10.22059/JDESERT.2019.72449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil classification systems are very useful for a simple and fast summarization of soil properties. These systems indicate the method for data summarization and facilitate connections among researchers, engineers, and other users. One of the practical systems for soil classification is Soil Taxonomy (ST). As determining  soil classes for an  entire area is expensive, time-consuming, and almost impossible, this research has tried to predict the soil classes in each level of the ST system (up to family level) by using the data of 120 excavated pedons and some auxiliary parameters (such as derivatives of digital elevation model, i.e., DEM) in Shahrekord plain, central Iran. For this reason, the decision tree model was encoded and implemented in the MATLAB software for three conditions: use of soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and its combination. According to the results, soil class prediction error by using soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and its combination was estimated to be 0, 3.33 and 0% for order and suborder levels; 0.83, 15 and 0.83% for great group level; 3.33, 22.5 and 3.33% for subgroup level and 30, 52.5 and 30% for family level, respectively. In addition, the use of kriging maps of soil properties (instead of 120 observational points) decreased the prediction error of the modeling in all levels of the ST system. It seems that the effect of auxiliary parameters (in comparison to soil properties) is not very significant for predicting soil classes in low-relief areas.","PeriodicalId":11118,"journal":{"name":"Desert","volume":"24 1","pages":"153-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desert","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2019.72449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Soil classification systems are very useful for a simple and fast summarization of soil properties. These systems indicate the method for data summarization and facilitate connections among researchers, engineers, and other users. One of the practical systems for soil classification is Soil Taxonomy (ST). As determining  soil classes for an  entire area is expensive, time-consuming, and almost impossible, this research has tried to predict the soil classes in each level of the ST system (up to family level) by using the data of 120 excavated pedons and some auxiliary parameters (such as derivatives of digital elevation model, i.e., DEM) in Shahrekord plain, central Iran. For this reason, the decision tree model was encoded and implemented in the MATLAB software for three conditions: use of soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and its combination. According to the results, soil class prediction error by using soil properties, auxiliary parameters, and its combination was estimated to be 0, 3.33 and 0% for order and suborder levels; 0.83, 15 and 0.83% for great group level; 3.33, 22.5 and 3.33% for subgroup level and 30, 52.5 and 30% for family level, respectively. In addition, the use of kriging maps of soil properties (instead of 120 observational points) decreased the prediction error of the modeling in all levels of the ST system. It seems that the effect of auxiliary parameters (in comparison to soil properties) is not very significant for predicting soil classes in low-relief areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用决策树模型预测土壤性质、辅助参数及其组合
土壤分类系统对于简单快速地总结土壤特性非常有用。这些系统指示了数据汇总的方法,并促进了研究人员、工程师和其他用户之间的联系。土壤分类的实用系统之一是土壤分类学。由于确定整个地区的土壤类别既昂贵又耗时,而且几乎不可能,本研究试图通过使用伊朗中部Shahrekord平原120个挖掘土块的数据和一些辅助参数(如数字高程模型的导数,即DEM)来预测ST系统各个级别(直到家庭级别)的土壤类别。为此,在MATLAB软件中对决策树模型进行了编码和实现,适用于三个条件:土壤特性的使用、辅助参数及其组合。根据结果,利用土壤性质、辅助参数及其组合对土壤类别的预测误差在序级和亚序级分别为0、3.33和0%;大群体水平分别为0.83、15和0.83%;亚组水平分别为3.33、22.5和3.33%,家庭水平分别为30、52.5和30%。此外,使用土壤性质的克里格图(而不是120个观测点)降低了ST系统各级建模的预测误差。辅助参数(与土壤性质相比)对预测低海拔地区的土壤类别的影响似乎不是很显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of spatial interpolation techniques for drought severity analysis in Salt Lake Basin An Ecological Agricultural Model Using Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE II Approach Investigation of Cd, Pb, and Ni contamination in soil and wheat plant in alluvial lands of Tigris River in southern Baghdad, Iraq Promotion of the seedling growth (Nitraria scoberi L.) in cultivating trays and seedling bag Assessment of agricultural drought using MODIS derived FAO's agriculture stress index system (ASIS) over the Iran croplands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1