Comparison of Microbial Detection of Hemodialysis Water in Reasoner’s 2A Agar (R2A) and Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA)

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Journal of Bacteriology and Virology Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.4167/jbv.2021.51.2.79
Sanghyun Park, Young-Hyeon Lee, Min-Ho Yeo, H. Lee, Hye-Sook Kim, Kyung-Soo Chang
{"title":"Comparison of Microbial Detection of Hemodialysis Water in Reasoner’s 2A Agar (R2A) and Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA)","authors":"Sanghyun Park, Young-Hyeon Lee, Min-Ho Yeo, H. Lee, Hye-Sook Kim, Kyung-Soo Chang","doi":"10.4167/jbv.2021.51.2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ƒThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ license/by-nc/3.0/). The quality management of dialysis water used as dialysis fluid is important for patients exposed to large amounts of water. The treatment of dialysis water causes chemical and microbiological contamination. Dialysis water contaminated with bacteria causes various diseases and inflammatory reactions due to the inflow of toxins into the body. Consequently, the aim of this study was to understand the sensitivity of agar for the detection of bacteria in dialysis water, the seasonal characteristics of bacterial culture, and bacterial identification. In all, 420 samples of dialysis water collected from a hospital between September 2017 and August 2018 were cultured at clinical laboratories. The bacterial growth rate of R2A was 99 cases (23.5%), and that of TSA was 47 cases (11.1%). R2A was more sensitive than TSA for samples incubated above 1 CFU/ml in hemodialysis, and TSA was more sensitive than R2A for samples incubated above 50 CFU/ml. The morphological characteristics of the microorganisms were confirmed by gram staining 188 strains of 30 isolates from the specimens. In R2A, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33.3% (n = 42), Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 56.3% (n = 71), and fungal strains were isolated in 10.3% (n = 13). In TSA, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33.8% (n = 21), Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 64.5% (n = 40), and fungal strains were isolated in 1.6% (n = 1). In addition, seasonal distinctions were observed in microbial cultures.","PeriodicalId":39739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology and Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2021.51.2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ƒThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ license/by-nc/3.0/). The quality management of dialysis water used as dialysis fluid is important for patients exposed to large amounts of water. The treatment of dialysis water causes chemical and microbiological contamination. Dialysis water contaminated with bacteria causes various diseases and inflammatory reactions due to the inflow of toxins into the body. Consequently, the aim of this study was to understand the sensitivity of agar for the detection of bacteria in dialysis water, the seasonal characteristics of bacterial culture, and bacterial identification. In all, 420 samples of dialysis water collected from a hospital between September 2017 and August 2018 were cultured at clinical laboratories. The bacterial growth rate of R2A was 99 cases (23.5%), and that of TSA was 47 cases (11.1%). R2A was more sensitive than TSA for samples incubated above 1 CFU/ml in hemodialysis, and TSA was more sensitive than R2A for samples incubated above 50 CFU/ml. The morphological characteristics of the microorganisms were confirmed by gram staining 188 strains of 30 isolates from the specimens. In R2A, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33.3% (n = 42), Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 56.3% (n = 71), and fungal strains were isolated in 10.3% (n = 13). In TSA, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33.8% (n = 21), Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 64.5% (n = 40), and fungal strains were isolated in 1.6% (n = 1). In addition, seasonal distinctions were observed in microbial cultures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R2A琼脂(R2A)和TSA琼脂对血液透析水中微生物检测的比较
这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可协议(http://creativecommons.org/ License /by-nc/3.0/)的开放获取文章。作为透析液的透析水的质量管理对于暴露于大量水的患者是重要的。透析水的处理会引起化学和微生物污染。被细菌污染的透析水由于毒素流入体内而引起各种疾病和炎症反应。因此,本研究的目的是了解琼脂对透析水中细菌检测的敏感性,细菌培养的季节性特征以及细菌鉴定。2017年9月至2018年8月期间,从一家医院收集的420份透析水样本在临床实验室进行了培养。R2A细菌生长率为99例(23.5%),TSA细菌生长率为47例(11.1%)。对于血液透析中培养高于1 CFU/ml的样品,R2A比TSA更敏感;对于培养高于50 CFU/ml的样品,TSA比R2A更敏感。用革兰氏染色法鉴定了30株188株的微生物形态特征。在R2A中分离到革兰氏阳性菌占33.3% (n = 42),革兰氏阴性菌占56.3% (n = 71),真菌菌占10.3% (n = 13)。TSA检出革兰氏阳性菌占33.8% (n = 21),革兰氏阴性菌占64.5% (n = 40),真菌菌占1.6% (n = 1)。此外,微生物培养也存在季节差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology
Journal of Bacteriology and Virology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Plazomicin—a New Aminoglycoside—for Treating Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Trends in Norovirus Distribution among the Children of Childcare Center Intestinal Organoid as a Research Platform for the Virus-host Interaction Distribution and Transmission of Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates Co-resistant to Colistin and Carbapenem in Gangwon Province, South Korea Antiviral Activity of Flavonoids Against Non-polio Enteroviruses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1