{"title":"On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style","authors":"T. V. Haaften, M. V. Leeuwen","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20014.haa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a\n difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is\n therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of\n argumentative style.\n In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of\n methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a\n pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing\n the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of\n argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the\n argumentative strategies involved.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a
difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is
therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of
argumentative style.
In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of
methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a
pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing
the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of
argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the
argumentative strategies involved.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.