Donbas: the post-Soviet conflict that changed Europe

Q1 Social Sciences European Politics and Society Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.1080/23745118.2022.2074398
A. Matveeva
{"title":"Donbas: the post-Soviet conflict that changed Europe","authors":"A. Matveeva","doi":"10.1080/23745118.2022.2074398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Without negating geopolitics, the developments in the breakaway entities of Donbas post-cessation of active war; and the fate of the dominant policy options for resolving the conflict need to be understood to explain the missing piece in the puzzle of Russia's choice for war in 2022. These territories were unable to evolve into viable socio-economic and political entities. The conflict never ended, and was spiralling by 2021; corruption was rampant; while professionalising the ‘self-defence forces' was an uphill task. Deindustrialising trends and food insecurity prompted population flight and left the areas dependant on Russian support. Ukrainian government continued with military hostilities and an economic blockade, denuding support for Ukrainian unity. These factors together with COVID movement restrictions pushed the population along an irredentist pathway: seeking integration with Russia. In the light of these changes, the dominant policy options that had previously been conceived as potential solutions fared differently. The idea that Donbas would become the viable example of Russian World failed. The option of re-joining a ‘reformed Ukraine’ failed because Ukraine moved in different direction, also pursuing security agenda considered hostile by Russia. Eventually, recognition and incorporation into Russia appeared as the only prospect left, and triggered a policy pivot.","PeriodicalId":53479,"journal":{"name":"European Politics and Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"410 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2074398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Without negating geopolitics, the developments in the breakaway entities of Donbas post-cessation of active war; and the fate of the dominant policy options for resolving the conflict need to be understood to explain the missing piece in the puzzle of Russia's choice for war in 2022. These territories were unable to evolve into viable socio-economic and political entities. The conflict never ended, and was spiralling by 2021; corruption was rampant; while professionalising the ‘self-defence forces' was an uphill task. Deindustrialising trends and food insecurity prompted population flight and left the areas dependant on Russian support. Ukrainian government continued with military hostilities and an economic blockade, denuding support for Ukrainian unity. These factors together with COVID movement restrictions pushed the population along an irredentist pathway: seeking integration with Russia. In the light of these changes, the dominant policy options that had previously been conceived as potential solutions fared differently. The idea that Donbas would become the viable example of Russian World failed. The option of re-joining a ‘reformed Ukraine’ failed because Ukraine moved in different direction, also pursuing security agenda considered hostile by Russia. Eventually, recognition and incorporation into Russia appeared as the only prospect left, and triggered a policy pivot.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顿巴斯:改变欧洲的后苏联冲突
摘要在不否定地缘政治的前提下,顿巴斯分离实体在主动战争停止后的发展;需要理解解决冲突的主要政策选择的命运,以解释俄罗斯在2022年选择战争这一谜题中缺失的一块。这些领土无法发展成为可行的社会经济和政治实体。这场冲突从未结束,到2021年愈演愈烈;腐败猖獗;而“自卫队”的专业化是一项艰巨的任务。去工业化趋势和粮食不安全促使人口外逃,使这些地区依赖俄罗斯的支持。乌克兰政府继续进行军事敌对行动和经济封锁,谴责对乌克兰团结的支持。这些因素加上新冠肺炎疫情的行动限制,将人口推向了一条不可修复的道路:寻求与俄罗斯的融合。鉴于这些变化,以前被视为潜在解决方案的主要政策选择表现不同。顿巴斯将成为俄罗斯世界的可行范例的想法失败了。重新加入“改革后的乌克兰”的选择失败了,因为乌克兰朝着不同的方向前进,也在追求被俄罗斯视为敌对的安全议程。最终,承认并并入俄罗斯似乎是仅存的前景,并引发了政策转向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Politics and Society
European Politics and Society Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The editors of European Politics and Society welcome the submission of high quality articles on all aspects of European Politics, widely defined to include, comparative politics, political sociology, social policy, international relations, security, and modern history. The geographical scope of the journal covers all parts of Europe including the Russian Federation. The Journal also welcomes proposals for special thematic issues. For further guidelines on submission of special issue proposals, please see the Instructions for Authors page. All articles will be subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two referees.
期刊最新文献
Discovering neighbors: the regional migration experience as a source of intergroup contact Why do business leaders, senior politicians and civil servants move to leading positions in EU civil society? Exploring capital gains through boundary crossing Challenged by postmaterialism: left-wing parties in postcommunist Europe Political realignment in Western Europe in the twenty-first century: eroding satisfaction and trust in democracy and its institutions? Individual sources of support for the EU and transnational cleavage beliefs: assessing the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1