Assessment of articular disc with mri in patients with disc displacement of temporo-mandibular joint – MRI the game changer

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_286_22
Suvarna Gavhane, Avinash Kshar, Raghavendra Byakodi, Arati Paranjpe, Sunil Awale, M. Shete
{"title":"Assessment of articular disc with mri in patients with disc displacement of temporo-mandibular joint – MRI the game changer","authors":"Suvarna Gavhane, Avinash Kshar, Raghavendra Byakodi, Arati Paranjpe, Sunil Awale, M. Shete","doi":"10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_286_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is considered a complex joint. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain. At least one TMD symptom is seen in 33% of the population and 3.6% to 7.0% of the population shows significant severity warranting treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is better for the evaluation of disc and adjacent soft-tissue structures compared to cone beam computed tomography. MRI allows articular disc assessment in open and closed mouth positions. MRI has 95% accuracy in the assessment of disc disorders and 93% accuracy for osseous changes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with a sample size of 21 patients as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. MRI findings were noted and compared with clinical findings. Results: As per our study, the most common age group is between 20 and 35 years. Of 42 TMJ, 41 joints show disc displacement changes and one TMJ was normal. Disc displacement with reduction is less than disc displacement without reduction. Left TMJ is more affected as disc displacement without reduction, as compared to the right side. Two TMJ were with posterior DD. Four TMJ shows anteromedial and 4 TMJ shows anterolateral DD. Six joints have a subluxation. Conclusion: In our study, we found that MRI in TMDs is more reliable and accurate for the diagnosis of DD.","PeriodicalId":31366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology","volume":"35 1","pages":"66 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_286_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is considered a complex joint. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain. At least one TMD symptom is seen in 33% of the population and 3.6% to 7.0% of the population shows significant severity warranting treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is better for the evaluation of disc and adjacent soft-tissue structures compared to cone beam computed tomography. MRI allows articular disc assessment in open and closed mouth positions. MRI has 95% accuracy in the assessment of disc disorders and 93% accuracy for osseous changes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with a sample size of 21 patients as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. MRI findings were noted and compared with clinical findings. Results: As per our study, the most common age group is between 20 and 35 years. Of 42 TMJ, 41 joints show disc displacement changes and one TMJ was normal. Disc displacement with reduction is less than disc displacement without reduction. Left TMJ is more affected as disc displacement without reduction, as compared to the right side. Two TMJ were with posterior DD. Four TMJ shows anteromedial and 4 TMJ shows anterolateral DD. Six joints have a subluxation. Conclusion: In our study, we found that MRI in TMDs is more reliable and accurate for the diagnosis of DD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌关节盘移位患者关节盘的mri评估- mri改变游戏规则
背景:颞下颌关节被认为是一种复杂的关节。颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)是肌肉骨骼疼痛的常见原因。33%的人群中至少有一种TMD症状,3.6%至7.0%的人群表现出显著的严重性,需要治疗。与锥形束计算机断层扫描相比,磁共振成像(MRI)更适合评估椎间盘和邻近软组织结构。MRI允许在开口和闭口位置评估关节盘。MRI对椎间盘疾病的评估准确率为95%,对骨变化的评估准确度为93%。材料和方法:根据纳入和排除标准,对21名患者进行了横断面研究。记录MRI结果并与临床结果进行比较。结果:根据我们的研究,最常见的年龄组在20至35岁之间。在42个TMJ中,41个关节显示椎间盘位移变化,1个TMJ正常。有减少的阀瓣位移小于无减少的阀盘位移。与右侧相比,左侧颞下颌关节受到的影响更大,因为椎间盘位移没有减少。两个TMJ为后DD。四个TMJ显示前内侧,四个TMJ显示前外侧DD。六个关节半脱位。结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现TMDs的MRI诊断DD更可靠、更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology (JIAOMR) (ISSN: Print - 0972-1363, Online - 0975-1572), an official publication of the Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology (IAOMR), is a peer-reviewed journal, published Quarterly , both in the form of hard copies (print version) as well as on the web (electronic version). The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jiaomr.in. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Study of Condylar Morphology by Digital Panoramic Radiographs Using mobile multimedia platform for teaching radiographic diagnosis Diode laser-assisted excision of oral soft-tissue lesions: A case series Evaluation of autoantibodies in oral submucous fibrosis: A clinicopathological study Hyporesponsiveness of Nerves of the Dental Pulp in Type 2 Diabetes – An Enigmatic Oral Sign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1