Standardized management of pediatric abdominal pain admissions improves patient outcomes – A quality improvement project

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare Pub Date : 2023-07-15 DOI:10.1177/20101058231188875
Lok Hui Lu, Hana Arbab, Choo Suet Cheng, Ong Lin Yin, Ong Choo Phaik Caroline
{"title":"Standardized management of pediatric abdominal pain admissions improves patient outcomes – A quality improvement project","authors":"Lok Hui Lu, Hana Arbab, Choo Suet Cheng, Ong Lin Yin, Ong Choo Phaik Caroline","doi":"10.1177/20101058231188875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children commonly present at the emergency department with abdominal pain and it is challenging to identify urgent surgical conditions. An audit conducted at a tertiary children’s hospital showed that 70% of patients admitted to Department of Pediatric Surgery (PAS) for abdominal pain had non-surgical diagnoses and wide variation in management. Our quality improvement (QI) project aimed to reduce length of stay (LOS) and unnecessary investigations performed for patients admitted to PAS with abdominal pain, without causing complications or delayed diagnosis of surgical conditions. The QI project consists of a standardised management workflow with stringent discharge criteria. We reviewed outcome measures of LOS, number of investigations ordered, compliance to workflow and readmission within 1-week post discharge at the end of each Plan-Do- Study-Act (PDSA) cycle and iteratively improved the workflow following QI principles. 61% of patients were admitted to PAS for non-surgical abdominal pain throughout three PDSA cycles conducted. The third cycle showed improved compliance to workflow (80.7%) with reduced median LOS by 1 day, reduced median number of blood, stool and urine investigations by 1 and reduced range of investigations ordered. Readmission and CE attendance rate 1 week after discharge was 1.6% ( n = 3), which was comparable to audit at 2.3% ( n = 4), p = 0.709. The workflow reduced LOS, number of unnecessary investigations and variability in investigations ordered, without causing misdiagnosis. It improved patient experience with sizeable cost savings for the patient and the hospital. QI projects can improve patient outcomes by introducing standard protocols that aid clinical management.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058231188875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children commonly present at the emergency department with abdominal pain and it is challenging to identify urgent surgical conditions. An audit conducted at a tertiary children’s hospital showed that 70% of patients admitted to Department of Pediatric Surgery (PAS) for abdominal pain had non-surgical diagnoses and wide variation in management. Our quality improvement (QI) project aimed to reduce length of stay (LOS) and unnecessary investigations performed for patients admitted to PAS with abdominal pain, without causing complications or delayed diagnosis of surgical conditions. The QI project consists of a standardised management workflow with stringent discharge criteria. We reviewed outcome measures of LOS, number of investigations ordered, compliance to workflow and readmission within 1-week post discharge at the end of each Plan-Do- Study-Act (PDSA) cycle and iteratively improved the workflow following QI principles. 61% of patients were admitted to PAS for non-surgical abdominal pain throughout three PDSA cycles conducted. The third cycle showed improved compliance to workflow (80.7%) with reduced median LOS by 1 day, reduced median number of blood, stool and urine investigations by 1 and reduced range of investigations ordered. Readmission and CE attendance rate 1 week after discharge was 1.6% ( n = 3), which was comparable to audit at 2.3% ( n = 4), p = 0.709. The workflow reduced LOS, number of unnecessary investigations and variability in investigations ordered, without causing misdiagnosis. It improved patient experience with sizeable cost savings for the patient and the hospital. QI projects can improve patient outcomes by introducing standard protocols that aid clinical management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科腹痛入院的标准化管理提高了患者的预后-一个质量改进项目
儿童通常因腹痛出现在急诊科,很难确定紧急手术情况。在一家三级儿童医院进行的审计显示,儿科外科(PAS)因腹痛入院的患者中,70%的患者有非手术诊断和广泛的管理差异。我们的质量改进(QI)项目旨在减少因腹痛入院PAS的患者的住院时间(LOS)和不必要的调查,而不会引起并发症或延误手术条件的诊断。QI项目由标准化的管理工作流程和严格的出院标准组成。我们在每个计划-研究-法案(PDSA)周期结束时,审查了LOS、下令调查次数、工作流程合规性和出院后1周内再次入院的结果指标,并根据QI原则反复改进了工作流程。在进行的三个PDSA周期中,61%的患者因非手术性腹痛而接受PAS治疗。第三个周期显示,对工作流程的依从性提高(80.7%),平均LOS减少了1天,血液、粪便和尿液调查的平均次数减少了1次,并减少了调查范围。出院后1周的复查和CE出勤率为1.6%(n=3),与2.3%(n=4)的审计相当,p=0.709。该工作流程减少了服务水平、不必要的调查数量和所需调查的可变性,而不会造成误诊。它改善了患者体验,为患者和医院节省了大量成本。QI项目可以通过引入有助于临床管理的标准协议来改善患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Caudal epidural, pericapsular nerve group block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in hip fracture surgery: A case report Assessment and evaluation of nutrition education among physicians in a tertiary paediatric specialist hospital: The need for improved clinical nutrition teaching Heat-related illness in Singapore: Descriptive analysis of a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2020 A review on cytomegalovirus in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Prevalence, clinical spectrum, treatment, and antiviral prophylaxis Ophthalmic primary care in Singapore: Considerations for review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1