Effects of released farmed mallards on species richness of breeding waterbirds and amphibians in natural, restored and constructed wetlands

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.2981/wlb.00846
P. Söderquist, L. Dessborn, Henric Djerf, J. Elmberg, G. Gunnarsson, S. Holopainen
{"title":"Effects of released farmed mallards on species richness of breeding waterbirds and amphibians in natural, restored and constructed wetlands","authors":"P. Söderquist, L. Dessborn, Henric Djerf, J. Elmberg, G. Gunnarsson, S. Holopainen","doi":"10.2981/wlb.00846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common practices in current game management are wetland restoration and creation, as well as releases of quarry species. We studied the impact of releases of mallard ducklings on species richness of wild waterbirds and amphibians on three types of wetlands: natural, constructed and restored. Data on species richness, macrophyte cover and water characteristics (total phosphorous and pH) were collected at 32 sites in an agricultural landscape in southern Sweden. In total, 14 species of waterbirds were recorded, ranging from zero to seven per wetland and survey. Amphibians were present in 24 of the 32 wetlands; in total five species were found, ranging from zero to three per wetland. By using generalized linear modelling we found that wetland type best predicted waterbird species richness. Constructed wetlands had significantly more waterbird species, regardless of whether they were used for mallard releases or not. There were breeding amphibians in 62% of natural, 100% of restored and 77% of constructed wetlands. Breeding amphibians were present in 84% of wetlands without, and in 62% of wetlands with releases. However, included variables did not explain amphibian species richness in the wetlands. Releasing large numbers of mallards on a wetland and providing food ad libitum is likely to affect water quality, nutrient availability and predation pressure. Indeed, phosphorous levels were significantly higher in release wetlands, but no differences were found between wetland types.This means that mallard releases may increase nutrient loads in environments that are already eutrophied. However, in our study system releases did not influence species richness of waterbirds and amphibians locally. Constructing wetlands for mallard releases can thus have positive local effects on species richness.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":"2021 1","pages":"wlb.00846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Common practices in current game management are wetland restoration and creation, as well as releases of quarry species. We studied the impact of releases of mallard ducklings on species richness of wild waterbirds and amphibians on three types of wetlands: natural, constructed and restored. Data on species richness, macrophyte cover and water characteristics (total phosphorous and pH) were collected at 32 sites in an agricultural landscape in southern Sweden. In total, 14 species of waterbirds were recorded, ranging from zero to seven per wetland and survey. Amphibians were present in 24 of the 32 wetlands; in total five species were found, ranging from zero to three per wetland. By using generalized linear modelling we found that wetland type best predicted waterbird species richness. Constructed wetlands had significantly more waterbird species, regardless of whether they were used for mallard releases or not. There were breeding amphibians in 62% of natural, 100% of restored and 77% of constructed wetlands. Breeding amphibians were present in 84% of wetlands without, and in 62% of wetlands with releases. However, included variables did not explain amphibian species richness in the wetlands. Releasing large numbers of mallards on a wetland and providing food ad libitum is likely to affect water quality, nutrient availability and predation pressure. Indeed, phosphorous levels were significantly higher in release wetlands, but no differences were found between wetland types.This means that mallard releases may increase nutrient loads in environments that are already eutrophied. However, in our study system releases did not influence species richness of waterbirds and amphibians locally. Constructing wetlands for mallard releases can thus have positive local effects on species richness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放养野鸭对自然湿地、恢复湿地和人工湿地中繁殖水鸟和两栖动物物种丰富度的影响
当前游戏管理中的常见做法是湿地恢复和创建,以及释放采石场物种。我们研究了绿头鸭的释放对三种类型湿地上野生水鸟和两栖动物物种丰富度的影响:自然湿地、人工湿地和恢复湿地。在瑞典南部农业景观的32个地点收集了物种丰富度、大型植物覆盖率和水特征(总磷和pH值)的数据。总共记录了14种水鸟,每个湿地和调查的水鸟数量从零到7种不等。两栖动物分布在32个湿地中的24个;总共发现了五个物种,每个湿地从零到三个不等。通过使用广义线性模型,我们发现湿地类型最能预测水鸟物种丰富度。人工湿地的水鸟种类明显更多,无论它们是否用于绿头鸭的放生。62%的自然湿地、100%的恢复湿地和77%的人工湿地都有繁殖的两栖动物。84%的无湿地和62%的有排泄物的湿地都存在繁殖两栖动物。然而,包含的变量并不能解释湿地中两栖动物物种的丰富度。在湿地上释放大量绿头鸭并随意提供食物可能会影响水质、营养物质的可用性和捕食压力。事实上,释放湿地的磷含量明显较高,但湿地类型之间没有差异。这意味着绿头鸭的释放可能会增加已经富营养化的环境中的营养负荷。然而,在我们的研究系统中,释放并没有影响当地水鸟和两栖动物的物种丰富度。因此,为绿头鸭的排泄建造湿地可以对物种丰富度产生积极的局部影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Wind energy development can lead to guild‐specific habitat loss in boreal forest bats Lying deadwood retention affects microhabitat use of martens (Martes spp.) in European mountain forests Evaluating population persistence of ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata) at the northeast edge of their distribution Epidemiological landscape of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and its impact on amphibian diversity at global scale Diet analysis of Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus) based on stable isotope analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1