Dewey’s Democracy and Education in the age of digital reason: the global, ecological and digital turns

Q1 Arts and Humanities Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23265507.2017.1395290
M. Peters, P. Jandrić
{"title":"Dewey’s Democracy and Education in the age of digital reason: the global, ecological and digital turns","authors":"M. Peters, P. Jandrić","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2017.1395290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dewey was perhaps the foremost theorist and advocate of participatory democracy as an ethical ideal based on a belief and faith in human experience as a general theory of education that would generate the requisite aims and methods for what he called ‘organized intelligence’ and what we might call today ‘collective intelligence’ – that is, as he says, ‘faith in democracy is all one with faith in experience and education’. In this paper we revisit Dewey’s Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1916/2001) in order to evaluate the growth and development of democracy against the decline of social democracy in the West. We identify the three turns which separate democracy of Dewey’s times and democracy of today – the global, the ecological, and the digital turn – and relate them to changing notions of citizenship. We analyse complex interplay between the turns, and show that they cannot be understood and / or analysed in separation. While the identified turns have indeed significantly changed circumstances in which Dewey produced his understanding of democracy, we conclude that his work still carries a lot of value and call for its reinvention in and for the age of digital reason.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2017.1395290","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1395290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dewey was perhaps the foremost theorist and advocate of participatory democracy as an ethical ideal based on a belief and faith in human experience as a general theory of education that would generate the requisite aims and methods for what he called ‘organized intelligence’ and what we might call today ‘collective intelligence’ – that is, as he says, ‘faith in democracy is all one with faith in experience and education’. In this paper we revisit Dewey’s Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1916/2001) in order to evaluate the growth and development of democracy against the decline of social democracy in the West. We identify the three turns which separate democracy of Dewey’s times and democracy of today – the global, the ecological, and the digital turn – and relate them to changing notions of citizenship. We analyse complex interplay between the turns, and show that they cannot be understood and / or analysed in separation. While the identified turns have indeed significantly changed circumstances in which Dewey produced his understanding of democracy, we conclude that his work still carries a lot of value and call for its reinvention in and for the age of digital reason.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜威的民主与数字理性时代的教育:全球、生态与数字转向
摘要杜威也许是参与式民主的最重要理论家和倡导者,参与式民主是一种基于对人类经验的信仰和信念的道德理想,是一种普遍的教育理论,它将为他所说的“有组织的智力”和我们今天所称的“集体智力”产生必要的目标和方法,“对民主的信仰与对经验和教育的信仰是一体的”。本文重新审视杜威的《民主与教育》。教育哲学导论(1916/2001),旨在评估西方社会民主衰落的背景下民主的成长和发展。我们确定了杜威时代的民主和当今民主的三个转折点——全球、生态和数字转折点——并将它们与不断变化的公民观念联系起来。我们分析了转弯之间复杂的相互作用,并表明它们不能单独理解和/或分析。虽然确定的转折确实显著改变了杜威对民主的理解,但我们得出结论,他的作品仍然具有很大的价值,并呼吁在数字理性时代对其进行重塑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Review of Educational Research
Open Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experimenting with academic subjectivity: collective writing, peer production and collective intelligence What’s In a game? A game-based approach to exploring 21st-century European identity and values How to integrate addiction medicine in psychiatry training: results of an experiment with two educational methods Is peer review in academic publishing still working?* Love, attention and teaching: Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1