An assessment of aquatic amphibian biodiversity on the California Lost Coast

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Freshwater Ecology Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI:10.1080/02705060.2022.2118181
E. McAlpine-Bellis, L. Thayer, M. E. Berberich, M. C. Bouffard, B. Hudgens
{"title":"An assessment of aquatic amphibian biodiversity on the California Lost Coast","authors":"E. McAlpine-Bellis, L. Thayer, M. E. Berberich, M. C. Bouffard, B. Hudgens","doi":"10.1080/02705060.2022.2118181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the most difficult aspects of studying intact amphibian communities is that they tend to occupy isolated areas within inaccessible terrain—factors that both protect watersheds from development and disturbance while also making them difficult to study. We conducted an extensive survey of the freshwater herpetofauna of the remote King Range National Conservation Area in Northern California using a combination of visual encounter surveys and environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling. We found twelve species of native aquatic amphibians and the western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), and no introduced amphibians. Detection probabilities for the four most commonly encountered species, giant salamanders (Dicamptodon sp), foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii), western toads (Anaxyrus boreas), and black salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus), were affected by substrate and canopy cover, but the effects of these habitat characteristics on detection probability were species specific. Neither survey method, visual encounter surveys nor eDNA sampling, was more effective than the other, and our study suggests that the use of visual encounter surveys in conjunction with eDNA sampling may counteract the shortcomings of either when done individually. Five species were found using both methods, seven were only encountered during visual encounter surveys, and one recorded only from eDNA sampling. DNA samples from two taxa, toads and giant salamanders, could not be resolved to species. Toad species identity was assigned to the only member of the candidate species with a species range known to overlap the study area; the other three candidate species occupy restricted ranges far from the study area. Neither of the two giant salamander candidate species have known species ranges overlapping the study area. One, the California giant salamander (D. ensata), is known to occur within 100 km. However, there is a paucity of genetic material in GenBank DNA library for both the California giant salamander and the coastal giant salamander (D. tenebrosus), a widely distributed species with a range overlapping the study area, which could lead to inaccurate assignment of eDNA fragments.","PeriodicalId":54830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Freshwater Ecology","volume":"37 1","pages":"481 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Freshwater Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2022.2118181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract One of the most difficult aspects of studying intact amphibian communities is that they tend to occupy isolated areas within inaccessible terrain—factors that both protect watersheds from development and disturbance while also making them difficult to study. We conducted an extensive survey of the freshwater herpetofauna of the remote King Range National Conservation Area in Northern California using a combination of visual encounter surveys and environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling. We found twelve species of native aquatic amphibians and the western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), and no introduced amphibians. Detection probabilities for the four most commonly encountered species, giant salamanders (Dicamptodon sp), foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii), western toads (Anaxyrus boreas), and black salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus), were affected by substrate and canopy cover, but the effects of these habitat characteristics on detection probability were species specific. Neither survey method, visual encounter surveys nor eDNA sampling, was more effective than the other, and our study suggests that the use of visual encounter surveys in conjunction with eDNA sampling may counteract the shortcomings of either when done individually. Five species were found using both methods, seven were only encountered during visual encounter surveys, and one recorded only from eDNA sampling. DNA samples from two taxa, toads and giant salamanders, could not be resolved to species. Toad species identity was assigned to the only member of the candidate species with a species range known to overlap the study area; the other three candidate species occupy restricted ranges far from the study area. Neither of the two giant salamander candidate species have known species ranges overlapping the study area. One, the California giant salamander (D. ensata), is known to occur within 100 km. However, there is a paucity of genetic material in GenBank DNA library for both the California giant salamander and the coastal giant salamander (D. tenebrosus), a widely distributed species with a range overlapping the study area, which could lead to inaccurate assignment of eDNA fragments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加利福尼亚失落海岸水生两栖动物生物多样性评估
研究完整的两栖动物群落最困难的一个方面是它们往往占据难以进入的孤立区域,这些因素既保护流域不受开发和干扰,也使它们难以研究。我们利用视觉接触调查和环境DNA (eDNA)采样相结合的方法,对北加州偏远的King Range国家保护区的淡水爬虫动物群进行了广泛的调查。发现本地水生两栖动物和西塘龟12种,无外来引进两栖动物。底物和冠层覆盖对大鲵(Dicamptodon sp)、山脚黄腿蛙(Rana boylii)、西部蟾蜍(Anaxyrus boreas)和黑蝾螈(Aneides flavipunctatus) 4种最常见物种的检测概率均有影响,但这些生境特征对检测概率的影响具有物种特异性。无论是视觉接触调查还是eDNA抽样,这两种调查方法都没有比另一种更有效,我们的研究表明,将视觉接触调查与eDNA抽样结合使用可以抵消单独进行时两者的缺点。两种方法共发现5种,其中7种仅在视觉接触调查中发现,1种仅通过eDNA采样记录。来自蟾蜍和大鲵这两个分类群的DNA样本无法确定物种。蟾蜍的物种身份被分配给候选物种中唯一已知物种范围与研究区域重叠的成员;其他三个候选物种分布在远离研究区域的有限范围内。两种大鲵候选物种都没有已知的物种范围与研究区域重叠。其中一种,加利福尼亚大鲵(D. ensata),已知出现在100公里范围内。然而,GenBank DNA文库中加利福尼亚大鲵和沿海大鲵(D. tenebrosus)的遗传物质缺乏,这可能导致eDNA片段的不准确分配。加利福尼亚大鲵是一种广泛分布的物种,其范围与研究区域重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Freshwater Ecology, published since 1981, is an open access peer-reviewed journal for the field of aquatic ecology of freshwater systems that is aimed at an international audience of researchers and professionals. Its coverage reflects the wide diversity of ecological subdisciplines and topics, including but not limited to physiological, population, community, and ecosystem ecology as well as biogeochemistry and ecohydrology of all types of freshwater systems including lentic, lotic, hyporheic and wetland systems. Studies that improve our understanding of anthropogenic impacts and changes to freshwater systems are also appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of lake eutrophication under different hydrological connectivity conditions Unravelling wetland connectivity: a comparative analysis of landscape structure and connectivity between natural and unnatural (artificial) wetlands in Van Sub-basin Spatial distribution of the planktonic and sediment bacterial communities in algae- and macrophyte-dominated zones of the Chengdong Lake Comparison of freshwater diatom assemblage between old-growth broad-leaved and planted coniferous forest basins in temperate region, Japan Environmental DNA metabarcoding for whole community inventories of vertebrates in rivers of the midwestern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1