The earliest time for haematocrit check after packed red blood cell transfusion among children with anaemia

Q. A. Adeleye, O. Oniyangi, L. Audu
{"title":"The earliest time for haematocrit check after packed red blood cell transfusion among children with anaemia","authors":"Q. A. Adeleye, O. Oniyangi, L. Audu","doi":"10.7196/SAJCH.2021.V15I3.01772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . Haematocrit check after red blood cell transfusion remains relevant in paediatric healthcare. The common practice of checking haematocrit at least 24 hours after transfusion has been challenged by recent evidence supporting much earlier timing. Available data are, however, limited and inconclusive.  Objective . To document the changes in haematocrit levels and to determine the earliest time of haematocrit stabilisation after packed red blood cell transfusion in children aged 29 days to 15 years.  Methods . This was a prospective observational study among 114 eligible participants. Capillary haematocrit was obtained pre-transfusion and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after transfusion. Post-transfusion haematocrit was considered to have stabilised if the difference in mean serial levels within at least 3 consecutive timed intervals was ≤1.8%. Target outcome was the earliest time to haematocrit stabilisation. Mean haematocrit at the earliest stabilisation time was compared with the expected level using the Student t -test.  Results . The age range of the 103 subjects analysed was 1.5 months - 14 years with a median of 48 months (interquartile range 12 - 96 months). Haematocrit increased significantly from pre-transfusion to 1-hour post-transfusion level and declined subsequently. The maximum difference between measurements at 1, 6 and 12 hours was 0.7%. In disaggregated analysis, it was 0.7%, 0.4%, 0.7% and 1.1% among subjects <1 year, 1 - <5 years, 5 - <10 years and 10 - 14 years old, respectively. The mean observed haematocrit at the first hour was similar to the expected level.  Conclusion . Post-transfusion haematocrit stabilised at the first hour. Haematocrit checking as early as 1 hour after packed cell transfusion is recommended in children.","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"137-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCH.2021.V15I3.01772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background . Haematocrit check after red blood cell transfusion remains relevant in paediatric healthcare. The common practice of checking haematocrit at least 24 hours after transfusion has been challenged by recent evidence supporting much earlier timing. Available data are, however, limited and inconclusive.  Objective . To document the changes in haematocrit levels and to determine the earliest time of haematocrit stabilisation after packed red blood cell transfusion in children aged 29 days to 15 years.  Methods . This was a prospective observational study among 114 eligible participants. Capillary haematocrit was obtained pre-transfusion and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after transfusion. Post-transfusion haematocrit was considered to have stabilised if the difference in mean serial levels within at least 3 consecutive timed intervals was ≤1.8%. Target outcome was the earliest time to haematocrit stabilisation. Mean haematocrit at the earliest stabilisation time was compared with the expected level using the Student t -test.  Results . The age range of the 103 subjects analysed was 1.5 months - 14 years with a median of 48 months (interquartile range 12 - 96 months). Haematocrit increased significantly from pre-transfusion to 1-hour post-transfusion level and declined subsequently. The maximum difference between measurements at 1, 6 and 12 hours was 0.7%. In disaggregated analysis, it was 0.7%, 0.4%, 0.7% and 1.1% among subjects <1 year, 1 - <5 years, 5 - <10 years and 10 - 14 years old, respectively. The mean observed haematocrit at the first hour was similar to the expected level.  Conclusion . Post-transfusion haematocrit stabilised at the first hour. Haematocrit checking as early as 1 hour after packed cell transfusion is recommended in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贫血儿童输血后红细胞压积检查的最早时间
背景红细胞输注后的血细胞比容检查仍然与儿科保健相关。输血后至少24小时检查红细胞压积的常见做法受到了支持更早时间的最新证据的挑战。然而,现有数据有限,没有结论。目标。记录红细胞压积水平的变化,并确定29天至15岁儿童在填充红细胞输注后红细胞压容稳定的最早时间。方法。这是一项对114名符合条件的参与者进行的前瞻性观察性研究。在输血前和输血后1、6、12、24和48小时获得毛细血管红细胞压积。如果在至少3个连续时间间隔内平均序列水平的差异≤1.8%,则认为输血后红细胞压积已稳定。目标结果是红细胞压容最早稳定的时间。使用Student t检验将最早稳定时间的平均红细胞压积与预期水平进行比较。结果。分析的103名受试者的年龄范围为1.5个月-14岁,中位数为48个月(四分位间距为12-96个月)。血细胞比容从输血前到输血后1小时显著增加,随后下降。在1小时、6小时和12小时的测量之间的最大差异为0.7%。在分类分析中,<1岁、1-<5岁、5-<10岁和10-14岁的受试者的差异分别为0.7%、0.4%、0.7%和1.1%。第一小时观察到的平均红细胞压积与预期水平相似。结论。输血后红细胞压积在第一个小时稳定下来。建议儿童在填充细胞输注后最早1小时进行血细胞比容检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Low birthweight and maternal smoking as predictors of infant lung function from a South African birth cohort within low socioeconomic communities An audit of electronic discharge summaries of neonates admitted with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy to tertiary hospitals in [City], 2018–2019. Borderline hypernatraemia and mortality rates in South African infants: A single-centre observational study The cost-effectiveness and value of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis and management of neonatal late-onset sepsis in resource-limited settings Issue 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1