Economics of climate change

Q4 Environmental Science Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.2478/oszn-2020-0004
T. Żylicz
{"title":"Economics of climate change","authors":"T. Żylicz","doi":"10.2478/oszn-2020-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper looks at the ineffectiveness of climate protection undertaken by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Despite the emission reduction measures commenced by some countries, the global emission of carbon dioxide has increased more than 40% since the adoption of the UNFCCC. The most important reason of the catastrophe is the so-called Berlin Mandate (1995), which exempts most of the countries in the world – including China that became the largest emitter in 2006 – from taking any binding commitments to reduce emissions. The Paris Agreement (2015) has been the first attempt to overcome the failure. There are a number of economic reasons why the protection process has not been successful so far. ‘Carbon leakage’ caused by the fact that most countries do not have binding commitments implies that emission from economies that impose restrictions moves to where it is not constrained. This calls for a global agreement on emission reduction. Such a global agreement requires recognition of the fact that climate protection is a public good. It is surprising that those UNFCCC signatories, who are likely to be hit by the lack of protection most acutely, hesitate to adopt effective provisions.","PeriodicalId":37767,"journal":{"name":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2020-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper looks at the ineffectiveness of climate protection undertaken by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Despite the emission reduction measures commenced by some countries, the global emission of carbon dioxide has increased more than 40% since the adoption of the UNFCCC. The most important reason of the catastrophe is the so-called Berlin Mandate (1995), which exempts most of the countries in the world – including China that became the largest emitter in 2006 – from taking any binding commitments to reduce emissions. The Paris Agreement (2015) has been the first attempt to overcome the failure. There are a number of economic reasons why the protection process has not been successful so far. ‘Carbon leakage’ caused by the fact that most countries do not have binding commitments implies that emission from economies that impose restrictions moves to where it is not constrained. This calls for a global agreement on emission reduction. Such a global agreement requires recognition of the fact that climate protection is a public good. It is surprising that those UNFCCC signatories, who are likely to be hit by the lack of protection most acutely, hesitate to adopt effective provisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候变化经济学
摘要本文探讨了《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)在气候保护方面的无效性。尽管一些国家开始采取减排措施,但自《联合国气候变化框架公约》通过以来,全球二氧化碳排放量增加了40%以上。这场灾难最重要的原因是所谓的柏林授权(1995年),该授权豁免了世界上大多数国家——包括2006年成为最大排放国的中国——采取任何有约束力的减排承诺。《巴黎协定》(2015年)是克服失败的第一次尝试。到目前为止,保护程序没有成功有很多经济原因大多数国家没有具有约束力的承诺,这一事实导致了碳泄漏,这意味着实施限制的经济体的排放会转移到不受限制的地方。这就要求达成一项全球减排协议。这样一项全球协议需要承认气候保护是一项公共利益这一事实。令人惊讶的是,那些《联合国气候变化框架公约》签署国可能会因缺乏保护而受到最严重的打击,却对通过有效的条款犹豫不决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych
Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND NATURAL RESOURCES is a publication which addresses the issues of broadly understood environmental protection and publishes research and review papers. All these articles and papers are peer-reviewed. Interdisciplinary studies published by specialists in various fields present reciprocal relationships between the reactions taking place in the environment which are connected with natural element cycle and at the same time reflect both natural processes and human impacts. Themes of the works also concern socio-economic and technical issues at the UE, national, regional and local levels in the context of sustainable development. The main aim of the journal is to promote high level research in all aspects of environment and natural resources protection.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Effectiveness of On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems Located at Roadside Rest Areas: Recognition and Diagnosis of Existing Problems in the Operation of Selected Facilities Stabilisation of the power grid with a hydrogen energy buffer How are polychlorinated biphenyls currently being produced, despite the production ban, and do they pose a risk to the environment? Assessment of waste amounts collected through the public system of waste collection and during clean-up activities in public spaces in Poland Assessment of pollutant emission in Poland from various categories of transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1