INTRAMUSCULAR PHENYLEPHRINE DOSE COMPARISON FOR PREVENTION OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA INDUCED HYPOTENSION DURING CESAREAN SECTION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND STUDY

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.35845/10.35845/kmuj.2022.22784
M. Shafiq, R. Ullah, Shahan Raza, Farrah Ashraf, Salma Jan, M. Shahid
{"title":"INTRAMUSCULAR PHENYLEPHRINE DOSE COMPARISON FOR PREVENTION OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA INDUCED HYPOTENSION DURING CESAREAN SECTION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND STUDY","authors":"M. Shafiq, R. Ullah, Shahan Raza, Farrah Ashraf, Salma Jan, M. Shahid","doi":"10.35845/10.35845/kmuj.2022.22784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To determine the more effective dose of intramuscular (IM) Phenylephrine in preventing hypotension due to spinal anesthesia (SA) administered for cesarean section. METHODS: The study was conducted from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, at Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, Pakistan. Sixty participants of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2, scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under SA were enrolled in this prospective double-blind study and randomized into two equal groups, P4-group and P8-group. P4-group received IM Phenylephrine 04 mg and P8-group received IM Phenylephrine 08 mg before SA. The incidence and intensity of hypotension, rescue doses of Phenylephrine and any adverse event, were recorded. Data collected was analyzed using Epi lnfo ™ version 7.2.5. RESULTS: Mean age of patients from P4-Group and P8-Group was 28.10±4.39 years and 28.33±4.95 years respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the two groups with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. Hypotension occurred in 33.3% (n=20/60) of participants. The incidence of hypotension in P4-group and P8-group were 46.7% (n=14/30) and 20% (n=6/30) respectively. In P8-group, risk of hypotension was 1.5 times less common compared with P4-group with 95% confidence interval of 1.02–2.19 (p=0.02). There was also no statistically significant difference between the onset of hypotension in the two groups. Those who developed hypotension had consumed a lesser amount of rescue Phenylephrine in P8-group compared with P4-group (p-value <0.01). CONCLUSION: Phenylephrine 08 mg IM preemptively controlled SA induced hypotension in a sustained way in the fit parturients.","PeriodicalId":42581,"journal":{"name":"Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35845/10.35845/kmuj.2022.22784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the more effective dose of intramuscular (IM) Phenylephrine in preventing hypotension due to spinal anesthesia (SA) administered for cesarean section. METHODS: The study was conducted from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, at Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, Pakistan. Sixty participants of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2, scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under SA were enrolled in this prospective double-blind study and randomized into two equal groups, P4-group and P8-group. P4-group received IM Phenylephrine 04 mg and P8-group received IM Phenylephrine 08 mg before SA. The incidence and intensity of hypotension, rescue doses of Phenylephrine and any adverse event, were recorded. Data collected was analyzed using Epi lnfo ™ version 7.2.5. RESULTS: Mean age of patients from P4-Group and P8-Group was 28.10±4.39 years and 28.33±4.95 years respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the two groups with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. Hypotension occurred in 33.3% (n=20/60) of participants. The incidence of hypotension in P4-group and P8-group were 46.7% (n=14/30) and 20% (n=6/30) respectively. In P8-group, risk of hypotension was 1.5 times less common compared with P4-group with 95% confidence interval of 1.02–2.19 (p=0.02). There was also no statistically significant difference between the onset of hypotension in the two groups. Those who developed hypotension had consumed a lesser amount of rescue Phenylephrine in P8-group compared with P4-group (p-value <0.01). CONCLUSION: Phenylephrine 08 mg IM preemptively controlled SA induced hypotension in a sustained way in the fit parturients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产术中肌注苯肾上腺素预防腰麻低血压的剂量比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究
目的:探讨肌注苯肾上腺素(IM)预防剖宫产术后腰麻低血压的更有效剂量。方法:研究于2020年1月1日至2020年7月31日在巴基斯坦白沙瓦Rehman医学研究所进行。选择美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)生理状态为1和2的60名在SA下计划择期剖宫产术(CS)的患者进行前瞻性双盲研究,随机分为p4组和p8组。p4组注射苯肾上腺素04 mg, p8组注射苯肾上腺素08 mg。记录低血压的发生率和强度、苯肾上腺素的抢救剂量及任何不良事件。使用Epi info™版本7.2.5分析收集的数据。结果:p4组和p8组患者的平均年龄分别为28.10±4.39岁和28.33±4.95岁。两组在人口学和临床特征方面无统计学差异。33.3% (n=20/60)的参与者出现低血压。p4组和p8组低血压发生率分别为46.7% (n=14/30)和20% (n=6/30)。p8组低血压发生率为p4组的1.5倍,95%可信区间为1.02 ~ 2.19 (p=0.02)。两组的低血压发生率也无统计学差异。与p4组相比,p8组出现低血压的患者消耗的抢救用苯肾上腺素较少(p值<0.01)。结论:苯肾上腺素08 mg IM对SA致低血压有持续的预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ
Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing the risks of nuclear war—the role of health professionals Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage Prevalence of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus in Rashid hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Munchausen syndrome - a case series at Camp Jail Lahore, Pakistan Mediating role of emotion disclosure between emotion regulation and apprehension in healthcare professionals during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1