Bonus-Malus Scale models: creating artificial past claims history

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Annals of Actuarial Science Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1017/S1748499522000100
J. Boucher
{"title":"Bonus-Malus Scale models: creating artificial past claims history","authors":"J. Boucher","doi":"10.1017/S1748499522000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent papers, Bonus-Malus Scales (BMS) estimated using data have been considered as an alternative to longitudinal data and hierarchical data approaches to model the dependence between different contracts for the same insured. Those papers, however, did not discuss in detail how to construct and understand BMS models, and many of the BMS’s basic properties were not discussed. The first objective of this paper is to correct this situation by explaining the logic behind BMS models and by describing those properties. More particularly, we will explain how BMS models are linked with simple count regression models that have covariates associated with the past claims experience. This study could help actuaries to understand how and why they should use BMS models for experience rating. The second objective of this paper is to create artificial past claims history for each insured. This is done by combining recent panel data theory with BMS models. We show that this addition significantly improves the prediction capacity of the BMS and provides a temporary solution for insurers who do not have enough historical data. We apply the BMS model to real data from a major Canadian insurance company. Results are analysed deeply to identify specific aspects of the BMS model.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"36 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499522000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In recent papers, Bonus-Malus Scales (BMS) estimated using data have been considered as an alternative to longitudinal data and hierarchical data approaches to model the dependence between different contracts for the same insured. Those papers, however, did not discuss in detail how to construct and understand BMS models, and many of the BMS’s basic properties were not discussed. The first objective of this paper is to correct this situation by explaining the logic behind BMS models and by describing those properties. More particularly, we will explain how BMS models are linked with simple count regression models that have covariates associated with the past claims experience. This study could help actuaries to understand how and why they should use BMS models for experience rating. The second objective of this paper is to create artificial past claims history for each insured. This is done by combining recent panel data theory with BMS models. We show that this addition significantly improves the prediction capacity of the BMS and provides a temporary solution for insurers who do not have enough historical data. We apply the BMS model to real data from a major Canadian insurance company. Results are analysed deeply to identify specific aspects of the BMS model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奖金Malus Scale模型:创建人工过去索赔历史
摘要在最近的研究中,利用数据估计的奖惩尺度(BMS)被认为是纵向数据和分层数据方法的替代方法,可以对同一被保险人的不同合同之间的依赖性进行建模。然而,这些论文并没有详细讨论如何构建和理解BMS模型,也没有讨论BMS的许多基本性质。本文的第一个目标是通过解释BMS模型背后的逻辑和描述这些属性来纠正这种情况。更具体地说,我们将解释BMS模型如何与具有与过去索赔经验相关的协变量的简单计数回归模型相关联。本研究可以帮助精算师理解如何以及为什么他们应该使用BMS模型进行经验评级。本文的第二个目标是为每个被保险人创建人工的过去索赔历史。这是通过将最近的面板数据理论与BMS模型相结合来完成的。我们表明,这一增加显著提高了BMS的预测能力,并为没有足够历史数据的保险公司提供了一个临时解决方案。我们将BMS模型应用于加拿大一家大型保险公司的真实数据。对结果进行深入分析,以确定BMS模型的具体方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Generalized Poisson random variable: its distributional properties and actuarial applications Optimizing insurance risk assessment: a regression model based on a risk-loaded approach Bonus-Malus Scale premiums for Tweedie’s compound Poisson models Risk analysis of a multivariate aggregate loss model with dependence Valuation of guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMABs) with physics-inspired neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1