Women in Roman Military Bases: Gendered Brooches from the Augustan Military Base and Flavio-Trajanic Fortress at Nijmegen, the Netherlands

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Britannia Pub Date : 2021-10-05 DOI:10.1017/s0068113x21000477
Vincent Van der Veen
{"title":"Women in Roman Military Bases: Gendered Brooches from the Augustan Military Base and Flavio-Trajanic Fortress at Nijmegen, the Netherlands","authors":"Vincent Van der Veen","doi":"10.1017/s0068113x21000477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Roman military bases were once regarded as strictly male domains with the only women living there being the senior officers’ wives. This view was challenged by studies that used material culture to identify women in Roman forts and interpret the roles they played. The best of this work considers both the multiple identities expressed through objects and the complexities of depositional and recovery processes. The article presented here fits into this recent development, as it investigates the presence of women in the Augustan military base and the Flavio-Trajanic fortress on the Hunerberg in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, by examining the spatial distribution of brooches (fibulae) associated with women. The distribution of female brooches is compared to that of military (male) brooches in order to highlight and interpret any significant patterns. While numbers are small, the quality of the contextual information allows for the examination of depositional and recovery practices. The paper also raises wider questions about the possibility of ‘gendering’ brooches.","PeriodicalId":44906,"journal":{"name":"Britannia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068113x21000477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roman military bases were once regarded as strictly male domains with the only women living there being the senior officers’ wives. This view was challenged by studies that used material culture to identify women in Roman forts and interpret the roles they played. The best of this work considers both the multiple identities expressed through objects and the complexities of depositional and recovery processes. The article presented here fits into this recent development, as it investigates the presence of women in the Augustan military base and the Flavio-Trajanic fortress on the Hunerberg in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, by examining the spatial distribution of brooches (fibulae) associated with women. The distribution of female brooches is compared to that of military (male) brooches in order to highlight and interpret any significant patterns. While numbers are small, the quality of the contextual information allows for the examination of depositional and recovery practices. The paper also raises wider questions about the possibility of ‘gendering’ brooches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马军事基地中的女性:荷兰奈梅亨奥古斯塔军事基地和弗拉维奥·特拉贾尼奇堡垒的性别胸针
罗马军事基地曾经被视为严格意义上的男性领地,居住在那里的女性只有高级军官的妻子。这一观点受到了利用物质文化来识别罗马堡垒中女性并解释她们所扮演角色的研究的挑战。这项工作最好的部分考虑了通过物体表达的多重身份以及沉积和回收过程的复杂性。本文符合这一最新发展,通过研究与女性相关的胸针(fibulae)的空间分布,调查了荷兰奈梅亨Hunerberg上的Augustan军事基地和Flavio Trajanic堡垒中女性的存在。将女性胸针的分布与军事(男性)胸针进行比较,以突出和解释任何重要的图案。虽然数量很少,但上下文信息的质量允许对沉积和回收实践进行检查。该论文还对胸针“性别化”的可能性提出了更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Britannia
Britannia Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
III. INSCRIPTIONS BRI volume 54 Cover and Back matter II. FINDS REPORTED UNDER THE PORTABLE ANTIQUITIES SCHEME ENGLAND 3. HADRIAN'S WALL I. SITES EXPLORED 1. WALES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1