Periprocedural myocardial injury after elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris: a tertiary center experience

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cor et vasa Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.33678/cor.2022.111
Mert Sarilar, V. Oktay, Gursu Demirci, D. Oksen, V. Sansoy
{"title":"Periprocedural myocardial injury after elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris: a tertiary center experience","authors":"Mert Sarilar, V. Oktay, Gursu Demirci, D. Oksen, V. Sansoy","doi":"10.33678/cor.2022.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Periprocedural myocardial injury and its clinical signifi cance in stable patients are still under discussion. This subject has been assessed in many studies with different defi nitions, thresholds, and biomarkers for years. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of periprocedural myocardial injury based on latest 4th UDMI guideline defi nitions. Methods: 238 patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention at single center were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who developed periprocedural myocardial injury were compared with patients with normal troponin values after the procedure for clinical outcomes. Primary clinical endpoints were death, MI, stroke, refractory angina, target vessel revascularization and hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome at one year. Results: Periprocedural myocardial injury was observed in 67.2% (n = 160) of patients. Number of lesions and stents, total stent length, total stent diameter, post-dilatation, overlapping stents, bifurcation stenting and SYNTAX score were signifi cantly higher in myocardial injury group. Clinical outcomes occurred in 16 patients, 11 of 16 had myocardial injury group, 5 of 16 had control group. No mortality was seen during the follow-up. Postprocedural troponin elevation was not associated with clinical outcomes (11 vs. 5, p = 0,56). Kaplan–Meier curve of clinical end points did not show any separation between the curves (Log rank test, 95% CI, p = 0,71). Conclusion: Stent size and length, post-dilatation, overlapping stents and stenting of bifurcation lesions lead to increase in myocardial injury. Periprocedural myocardial injury in stable angina does not predict clinical outcomes at one year.","PeriodicalId":10787,"journal":{"name":"Cor et vasa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cor et vasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2022.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprocedural myocardial injury and its clinical signifi cance in stable patients are still under discussion. This subject has been assessed in many studies with different defi nitions, thresholds, and biomarkers for years. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of periprocedural myocardial injury based on latest 4th UDMI guideline defi nitions. Methods: 238 patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention at single center were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who developed periprocedural myocardial injury were compared with patients with normal troponin values after the procedure for clinical outcomes. Primary clinical endpoints were death, MI, stroke, refractory angina, target vessel revascularization and hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome at one year. Results: Periprocedural myocardial injury was observed in 67.2% (n = 160) of patients. Number of lesions and stents, total stent length, total stent diameter, post-dilatation, overlapping stents, bifurcation stenting and SYNTAX score were signifi cantly higher in myocardial injury group. Clinical outcomes occurred in 16 patients, 11 of 16 had myocardial injury group, 5 of 16 had control group. No mortality was seen during the follow-up. Postprocedural troponin elevation was not associated with clinical outcomes (11 vs. 5, p = 0,56). Kaplan–Meier curve of clinical end points did not show any separation between the curves (Log rank test, 95% CI, p = 0,71). Conclusion: Stent size and length, post-dilatation, overlapping stents and stenting of bifurcation lesions lead to increase in myocardial injury. Periprocedural myocardial injury in stable angina does not predict clinical outcomes at one year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定型心绞痛择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后围手术期心肌损伤:三级中心经验
背景:稳定患者术中心肌损伤及其临床意义仍在讨论中。多年来,这一主题在许多具有不同定义、阈值和生物标志物的研究中得到了评估。本研究旨在根据最新的第4版UDMI指南定义确定围手术期心肌损伤的临床结果。方法:238例在单中心行择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。术后发生围手术期心肌损伤的患者与肌钙蛋白值正常的患者进行临床结果比较。主要临床终点为一年内死亡、心肌梗死、卒中、难治性心绞痛、靶血管重建术和因急性冠状动脉综合征住院。结果:术中心肌损伤发生率为67.2%(160例)。心肌损伤组病变及支架数量、支架总长度、支架总直径、扩张后、支架重叠、支架术分岔及SYNTAX评分均显著高于心肌损伤组。16例患者发生临床结局,16例中心肌损伤组11例,对照组5例。随访期间未见死亡。术后肌钙蛋白升高与临床结果无关(11比5,p = 0,56)。Kaplan-Meier曲线的临床终点之间没有任何分离(Log rank检验,95% CI, p = 0,71)。结论:支架的大小和长度、扩张后支架、重叠支架和分叉病变支架置入导致心肌损伤增加。稳定性心绞痛围手术期心肌损伤不能预测一年后的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cor et vasa
Cor et vasa CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
(Inclisiran - the first experiences) Clinical and Demographic Properties of Candida Endocarditis in a Tertiary Heart Center Role of Corin in Cardiovascular Disease (The effect of an inter-atrial communication in the treatment of the patients with heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction - current state of knowledge) Surgical treatment of aortic pseudoaneurysm after endovascular repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1