Buprenorphine analgesia following major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

R. Vlok, L. White, M. Binks, A. Hodge, T. Ryan, R. Baran, T. Melhuish
{"title":"Buprenorphine analgesia following major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"R. Vlok, L. White, M. Binks, A. Hodge, T. Ryan, R. Baran, T. Melhuish","doi":"10.21037/JECCM.2019.06.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opioid analgesia is commonly employed in the postoperative period. Opioids have a well-documented side effect profile. Their administration is made difficult following major abdominal surgery in those patients intolerant of oral intake. Furthermore, efforts are required to reduce the contribution of prescription opioids to the global illicit drug epidemic. Buprenorphine is thought to have a lesser side effect profile than morphine, is available in sublingual form and has a reduced risk of addiction. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and side effect profile of buprenorphine against morphine in managing pain following major abdominal surgery. Methods: Five databases were searched up to May 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing articles comparing buprenorphine with morphine post-major abdominal were included. Major abdominal surgery included operations on the abdominal wall, abdominal cavity or abdominal organs with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes. Postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse events, such as respiratory depression and sedation, were meta-analyzed. Results: Eleven studies with a combined pool of 764 patients were included. Buprenorphine provided improved analgesia from 6 to 12 hours postoperatively (P=0.0003). Pain and analgesia use were otherwise equivalent with buprenorphine and morphine use up to 48 hours postoperatively. There was no discrepancy in respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness or hypotension. \n Conclusions: Buprenorphine is non-inferior to morphine in managing pain following major abdominal surgery. Opioid-related side effects were unaltered. Further study is required to analyse rates of addiction. The study was hindered by the number of relevant studies and the age of included data.","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM.2019.06.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid analgesia is commonly employed in the postoperative period. Opioids have a well-documented side effect profile. Their administration is made difficult following major abdominal surgery in those patients intolerant of oral intake. Furthermore, efforts are required to reduce the contribution of prescription opioids to the global illicit drug epidemic. Buprenorphine is thought to have a lesser side effect profile than morphine, is available in sublingual form and has a reduced risk of addiction. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and side effect profile of buprenorphine against morphine in managing pain following major abdominal surgery. Methods: Five databases were searched up to May 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing articles comparing buprenorphine with morphine post-major abdominal were included. Major abdominal surgery included operations on the abdominal wall, abdominal cavity or abdominal organs with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes. Postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse events, such as respiratory depression and sedation, were meta-analyzed. Results: Eleven studies with a combined pool of 764 patients were included. Buprenorphine provided improved analgesia from 6 to 12 hours postoperatively (P=0.0003). Pain and analgesia use were otherwise equivalent with buprenorphine and morphine use up to 48 hours postoperatively. There was no discrepancy in respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness or hypotension. Conclusions: Buprenorphine is non-inferior to morphine in managing pain following major abdominal surgery. Opioid-related side effects were unaltered. Further study is required to analyse rates of addiction. The study was hindered by the number of relevant studies and the age of included data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部大手术后丁丙诺啡镇痛:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:阿片类镇痛是术后常用的镇痛方法。阿片类药物的副作用有充分的证据。对于那些不耐受口服的腹部大手术患者,给药变得困难。此外,需要努力减少处方类阿片对全球非法药物流行的影响。丁丙诺啡的副作用被认为比吗啡小,可以在舌下使用,而且上瘾的风险也较低。本研究旨在比较丁丙诺啡与吗啡治疗腹部大手术后疼痛的有效性和副作用。方法:检索截至2019年5月的5个数据库。纳入比较丁丙诺啡与吗啡在腹部大出血后的文章的随机对照试验。腹部大外科包括对腹壁、腹腔或腹部器官的手术,预计持续时间超过60分钟。术后疼痛和阿片类药物相关不良事件,如呼吸抑制和镇静,进行meta分析。结果:11项研究共纳入764例患者。丁丙诺啡改善了术后6 ~ 12小时的镇痛效果(P=0.0003)。术后48小时内,疼痛和镇痛的使用与丁丙诺啡和吗啡的使用相同。呼吸抑制、镇静、恶心、呕吐、头晕或低血压无差异。结论:丁丙诺啡治疗腹部大手术后疼痛的效果不逊于吗啡。阿片类药物相关的副作用没有改变。需要进一步的研究来分析成瘾率。相关研究的数量和纳入数据的年龄阻碍了这项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1