Yves Tillé, M. Debusschere, Henri Luomaranta, Martin Axelson, E. Elvers, A. Holmberg, R. Valliant
{"title":"Some Thoughts on Official Statistics and its Future (with discussion)","authors":"Yves Tillé, M. Debusschere, Henri Luomaranta, Martin Axelson, E. Elvers, A. Holmberg, R. Valliant","doi":"10.2478/jos-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we share some reflections on the state of statistical science and its evolution in the production systems of official statistics. We first try to make a synthesis of the evolution of statistical thinking. We then examine the evolution of practices in official statistics, which had to face very early on a diversification of sou rces: first with the use of censuses, then sample surveys and finally administrative files. At each stage, a profound revision of methods was necessary. We show that since the middle of the 20th century, one of the major challenges of statistics has been to produce estimates from a variety of sources. To do this, a large number of methods have been proposed which are based on very different f oundations. The term “big data” encompasses a set of sources and new statistical methods. We first examine the potential of valorization of big data in official statistics. Some applications such as image analysis for agricultural prediction are very old and will be further developed. However, we report our skepticism towards web-scrapping methods. Then we examine the use of new deep learning methods. With access to more and more sources, the great challenge will remain the valorization and harmonization of these sources.","PeriodicalId":51092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Official Statistics","volume":"38 1","pages":"557 - 598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Official Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2022-0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we share some reflections on the state of statistical science and its evolution in the production systems of official statistics. We first try to make a synthesis of the evolution of statistical thinking. We then examine the evolution of practices in official statistics, which had to face very early on a diversification of sou rces: first with the use of censuses, then sample surveys and finally administrative files. At each stage, a profound revision of methods was necessary. We show that since the middle of the 20th century, one of the major challenges of statistics has been to produce estimates from a variety of sources. To do this, a large number of methods have been proposed which are based on very different f oundations. The term “big data” encompasses a set of sources and new statistical methods. We first examine the potential of valorization of big data in official statistics. Some applications such as image analysis for agricultural prediction are very old and will be further developed. However, we report our skepticism towards web-scrapping methods. Then we examine the use of new deep learning methods. With access to more and more sources, the great challenge will remain the valorization and harmonization of these sources.
期刊介绍:
JOS is an international quarterly published by Statistics Sweden. We publish research articles in the area of survey and statistical methodology and policy matters facing national statistical offices and other producers of statistics. The intended readers are researchers or practicians at statistical agencies or in universities and private organizations dealing with problems which concern aspects of production of official statistics.