The Public-Private Distinction in Global Governance: How Relevant is it in the Case of Voluntary Sustainability Standards?

A. Marx
{"title":"The Public-Private Distinction in Global Governance: How Relevant is it in the Case of Voluntary Sustainability Standards?","authors":"A. Marx","doi":"10.1163/23525207-12340022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether global rules and standards originate from a public intergovernmental body or from a private organization has significant implications for the applicability of international law such as WTO law. However, how sensible is this distinction between public and private? This paper argues that the distinction between public and private standards only makes sense if one looks at the legal status of specific standard-setting organisations. However, the distinction between public and private begins to blur and fade if one switches the unit of analysis. First, the paper shows that private standards are often based on internationally agreed (public) rules and norms. Second, the paper argues that governments on purpose or in the design of their policies take these private initiatives on board. Hence, they become an integral part of ‘public’ governance. These arguments are developed on the basis of an analysis of Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS).","PeriodicalId":31142,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23525207-12340022","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Whether global rules and standards originate from a public intergovernmental body or from a private organization has significant implications for the applicability of international law such as WTO law. However, how sensible is this distinction between public and private? This paper argues that the distinction between public and private standards only makes sense if one looks at the legal status of specific standard-setting organisations. However, the distinction between public and private begins to blur and fade if one switches the unit of analysis. First, the paper shows that private standards are often based on internationally agreed (public) rules and norms. Second, the paper argues that governments on purpose or in the design of their policies take these private initiatives on board. Hence, they become an integral part of ‘public’ governance. These arguments are developed on the basis of an analysis of Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球治理中的公私差异:在自愿性可持续性标准的情况下,它的相关性如何?
全球规则和标准是来自政府间公共机构还是来自私人组织,对世贸组织法律等国际法的适用性具有重大影响。然而,这种公共和私人之间的区别有多明智?本文认为,只有从特定标准制定组织的法律地位来看,公共标准和私人标准之间的区别才有意义。然而,如果切换分析单位,公共和私人之间的区别就会开始模糊和消失。首先,论文表明,私人标准通常基于国际商定的(公共)规则和规范。其次,论文认为,政府有意或在制定政策时考虑到了这些私人举措。因此,它们成为“公共”治理的一个组成部分。这些论点是在对自愿可持续性标准(VSS)的分析基础上提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contemporary China and the “Harmonious” World Order in the Age of Globalization A Review of the Academic Debate about United Nations Security Council Reform Assessing the EU Framework Regulation for the Screening of Foreign Direct Investment—What Is the Effect on Chinese Investors? Mapping on Transnational Crime Routes in the New Silk Road: a Case Study of the Greater Mekong Sub-region China’s Military and the Belt and Road Initiative: a View from the Outside
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1