Telicity and object position in Taiwanese Southern Min and Hakka

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Review Pub Date : 2020-08-11 DOI:10.1515/tlr-2020-2047
Chyan‐an Arthur Wang, Hsiao‐hung Iris Wu
{"title":"Telicity and object position in Taiwanese Southern Min and Hakka","authors":"Chyan‐an Arthur Wang, Hsiao‐hung Iris Wu","doi":"10.1515/tlr-2020-2047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigates the phenomena of obligatory object preposing in Taiwanese Southern Min (TSM) and Hakka. We first refute the previous treatment of having the information-structural theory as an exclusive account of TSM and Hakka obligatory object preposing and show that telicity is another important dimension to object prespoing in the two languages. In particular, object preposing always takes place when a given verb bears a designated telicity marker, independent of the referential and information structural properties of its object. Consistent with recent work on the syntax of lexical aspect that telic readings are reflected in certain syntactic configurations, we suggest that in TSM and Hakka, telicity involves feature checking of the verb and its objects in the checking domain of a functional projection InAspP. For a theme argument to be able to measure out an event, it must enter an Agree relationship with the [telic] feature in InAsp, which has the edge property that triggers movement of the theme to its specifier. The proposed aspectual structure is further supported by distributional and interpretational properties including object preposing asymmetry, height of interpretation site of ambiguous adverbials, as well as the distribution of time-frame adjuncts and durative adjuncts.","PeriodicalId":46358,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"331 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tlr-2020-2047","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2020-2047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the phenomena of obligatory object preposing in Taiwanese Southern Min (TSM) and Hakka. We first refute the previous treatment of having the information-structural theory as an exclusive account of TSM and Hakka obligatory object preposing and show that telicity is another important dimension to object prespoing in the two languages. In particular, object preposing always takes place when a given verb bears a designated telicity marker, independent of the referential and information structural properties of its object. Consistent with recent work on the syntax of lexical aspect that telic readings are reflected in certain syntactic configurations, we suggest that in TSM and Hakka, telicity involves feature checking of the verb and its objects in the checking domain of a functional projection InAspP. For a theme argument to be able to measure out an event, it must enter an Agree relationship with the [telic] feature in InAsp, which has the edge property that triggers movement of the theme to its specifier. The proposed aspectual structure is further supported by distributional and interpretational properties including object preposing asymmetry, height of interpretation site of ambiguous adverbials, as well as the distribution of time-frame adjuncts and durative adjuncts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
闽南语与客家语的Telicity与宾语位置
摘要本文考察了闽南语和客家语中的强制性宾语前置现象。我们首先驳斥了以往将信息结构理论作为TSM和客家强制性宾语前置的排他性解释的说法,并指出特异性是这两种语言中宾语前置的另一个重要维度。特别是,当一个给定的动词带有指定的时态标记时,宾语前置总是发生,而不依赖于其宾语的指称和信息结构特性。与最近关于词汇方面句法的研究一致,即特化阅读反映在某些句法结构中,我们认为在TSM和客家语中,特化涉及在功能投射InAspP的检查域中对动词及其宾语的特征检查。为了使主题参数能够测量出事件,它必须与InAsp中的[telic]功能输入Agree关系,该功能具有触发主题移动到其说明符的边缘属性。所提出的方面结构得到了分布和解释性质的进一步支持,包括宾语前置不对称、歧义状语的解释位置高度,以及时间框架附加词和持续性附加词的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Review
Linguistic Review Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Linguistic Review aims at publishing high-quality papers in syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, within a framework of Generative Grammar and related disciplines, as well as critical discussions of theoretical linguistics as a branch of cognitive psychology. Striving to be a platform for discussion, The Linguistic Review welcomes reviews of important new monographs in these areas, dissertation abstracts, and letters to the editor. The editor also welcomes initiatives for thematic issues with guest editors. The Linguistic Review is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope.
期刊最新文献
Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese Morphological analysis of alienability contrast in Nuer: an atypical typical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1