Fukushima: Lessons learned from a devastating “near-miss”

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/00963402.2023.2200121
Y. Funabashi, Marina Fujita Dickson
{"title":"Fukushima: Lessons learned from a devastating “near-miss”","authors":"Y. Funabashi, Marina Fujita Dickson","doi":"10.1080/00963402.2023.2200121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Before the Fukushima disaster unfolded in 2011, Japanese government and energy company officials were aware of the warning signs and risks of a potential crisis at the reactor site. They failed to use safety mechanisms or update regulations over time to address the vulnerabilities of the power plants. Because interest groups had led the public to believe the power plants were completely safe, the plants were run with little accountability. Following this disaster, Japan established a new nuclear regulatory commission and nuclear regulatory authority in and implemented new regulatory mechanisms. These efforts have been limited, however, and have shifted the issue from regulation to implementation. The enormous cost of meeting new safety protocols has created new barriers for restarting the power plants under updated regulations, but the energy demands of the country will remain. The tension between managing operational risks and meeting public energy needs will test the public and private sectors’ ability to sufficiently revamp the nuclear industry and prevent crises in years to come.","PeriodicalId":46802,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists","volume":"79 1","pages":"161 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2200121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Before the Fukushima disaster unfolded in 2011, Japanese government and energy company officials were aware of the warning signs and risks of a potential crisis at the reactor site. They failed to use safety mechanisms or update regulations over time to address the vulnerabilities of the power plants. Because interest groups had led the public to believe the power plants were completely safe, the plants were run with little accountability. Following this disaster, Japan established a new nuclear regulatory commission and nuclear regulatory authority in and implemented new regulatory mechanisms. These efforts have been limited, however, and have shifted the issue from regulation to implementation. The enormous cost of meeting new safety protocols has created new barriers for restarting the power plants under updated regulations, but the energy demands of the country will remain. The tension between managing operational risks and meeting public energy needs will test the public and private sectors’ ability to sufficiently revamp the nuclear industry and prevent crises in years to come.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福岛:从一次毁灭性的“未遂事件”中吸取的教训
在2011年福岛核灾难发生之前,日本政府和能源公司官员就已经意识到反应堆现场可能出现危机的预警信号和风险。他们没有使用安全机制或随着时间的推移更新法规来解决发电厂的脆弱性。由于利益集团让公众相信核电站是完全安全的,所以核电站的运行几乎没有问责制。这次灾难发生后,日本成立了新的核管理委员会和核管理当局,并实施了新的监管机制。然而,这些努力是有限的,并将问题从监管转移到实施。满足新安全协议的巨大成本为在更新后的法规下重新启动电厂制造了新的障碍,但该国的能源需求将保持不变。管理运营风险和满足公共能源需求之间的紧张关系,将考验公共和私营部门在未来几年充分改革核工业和防止危机的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Where climate journalism is now: Interview with Emily Atkin, the fire behind the Heated climate newsletter Climate anxiety is not a mental health problem. But we should still treat it as one Book excerpt—Catastrophic climate change: Lessons from the dinosaurs Introduction: Climate change—where are we now? Redefining the wildfire problem and scaling solutions to meet the challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1