Neuromodulation therapies for central poststroke pain

Pain Research Pub Date : 2018-03-30 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.33.18
K. Hosomi, Takeshi Shimizu, Y. Goto, T. Mano, S. Oshino, H. Kishima, Y. Saitoh
{"title":"Neuromodulation therapies for central poststroke pain","authors":"K. Hosomi, Takeshi Shimizu, Y. Goto, T. Mano, S. Oshino, H. Kishima, Y. Saitoh","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.33.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is one of the most refractory neuropathic pain, and this condition is typically pharmacoresistant. Owing to the refractory nature of CPSP, neuromodulation therapies such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), electrical motor cortex stimulation (EMCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have been applied to treating for CPSP. This paper briefly describes profiles of CPSP, and reviews previous reports of each neuromodulation therapy, including our clinical experience. The long–term success rate of DBS of the sensory thalamus or periaqueductal grey matter has been reported to be about 30 % from 92 CPSP cases, while EMCS is most efficient, about 50 % success rate from 142 cases, in the invasive neuromodulation therapies. Recent meta–analyses and therapeutic guidelines reported that high–frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex was safe and had transient pain relieving effect. rTMS is currently the preferred treatment approach, but must be applied repeatedly for clinical practice. Although SCS was previously believed to be ineffective for CPSP, it can be applied to CPSP because some CPSP cases actually respond to SCS. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of CPSP and mechanisms of action of neuromodulation therapies could lead more–efficient targets and treatments.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11154/PAIN.33.18","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.33.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is one of the most refractory neuropathic pain, and this condition is typically pharmacoresistant. Owing to the refractory nature of CPSP, neuromodulation therapies such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), electrical motor cortex stimulation (EMCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have been applied to treating for CPSP. This paper briefly describes profiles of CPSP, and reviews previous reports of each neuromodulation therapy, including our clinical experience. The long–term success rate of DBS of the sensory thalamus or periaqueductal grey matter has been reported to be about 30 % from 92 CPSP cases, while EMCS is most efficient, about 50 % success rate from 142 cases, in the invasive neuromodulation therapies. Recent meta–analyses and therapeutic guidelines reported that high–frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex was safe and had transient pain relieving effect. rTMS is currently the preferred treatment approach, but must be applied repeatedly for clinical practice. Although SCS was previously believed to be ineffective for CPSP, it can be applied to CPSP because some CPSP cases actually respond to SCS. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of CPSP and mechanisms of action of neuromodulation therapies could lead more–efficient targets and treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中枢性脑卒中后疼痛的神经调控疗法
中枢性脑卒中后疼痛(CPSP)是最难治性的神经性疼痛之一,这种情况通常是耐药的。由于CPSP的难治性,神经调节疗法如深部脑刺激(DBS)、运动皮层电刺激(EMCS)、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和脊髓刺激(SCS)已被应用于治疗CPSP。本文简要介绍了CPSP的概况,并回顾了以往关于每种神经调节疗法的报道,包括我们的临床经验。据报道,92例CPSP病例中,感觉丘脑或导水管周围灰质DBS的长期成功率约为30%,而在侵袭性神经调节治疗中,EMCS最有效,142例成功率约为50%。最近的荟萃分析和治疗指南报道,初级运动皮层的高频rTMS是安全的,具有短暂的疼痛缓解作用。rTMS是目前首选的治疗方法,但必须在临床实践中反复应用。虽然先前认为SCS对CPSP无效,但由于一些CPSP病例实际上对SCS有反应,因此可以应用于CPSP。更好地了解CPSP的病理生理学和神经调节疗法的作用机制可以带来更有效的靶点和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1