Benefits Formulation in Construction Projects: An Exploratory Study through a Social Sustainability Perspective

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review Pub Date : 2020-03-24 DOI:10.1177/2277975219896510
Ashish Goel, L. Ganesh, Arshinder Kaur
{"title":"Benefits Formulation in Construction Projects: An Exploratory Study through a Social Sustainability Perspective","authors":"Ashish Goel, L. Ganesh, Arshinder Kaur","doi":"10.1177/2277975219896510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extant project management literature suggests that project benefits management (PBM) can facilitate social sustainability (SS) through benefits formulation for a wider set of project stakeholders. However, empirical evidence regarding the actual extent of SS considerations in benefits formulation is lacking, especially from large developing economies like India. To fill this gap, a SS-centric analysis of PBM plans of 80 construction projects has been conducted using content analysis to identify the benefits targeted at the internal and external stakeholders, viz., workers and project-affected community. The analysis reveals much higher occurrences of benefits for the affected community compared to those relating to the workers. The project proponents have highlighted the social relevance of projects mostly through ‘trickle down benefits’ – that may possibly accrue to the affected communities due to project investment – as compared to ‘co-created benefits’ – that empower the affected communities but require a deeper understanding of their needs and aspirations. ‘Local employment’ and ‘local business and economic growth’ are the most common benefits across projects. Three areas of improvement have been suggested in the benefits formulation process from a SS perspective – mandating worker-specific benefits, more focus on co-created benefits and specifying numeric measures of benefits along with timelines, to facilitate assessment of actual benefits realization during project implementation and operation phases. This study contributes to research literature on sustainable project management. Its findings offer useful implications for researchers, policymakers and project proponent organizations.","PeriodicalId":43330,"journal":{"name":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"162 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2277975219896510","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975219896510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Extant project management literature suggests that project benefits management (PBM) can facilitate social sustainability (SS) through benefits formulation for a wider set of project stakeholders. However, empirical evidence regarding the actual extent of SS considerations in benefits formulation is lacking, especially from large developing economies like India. To fill this gap, a SS-centric analysis of PBM plans of 80 construction projects has been conducted using content analysis to identify the benefits targeted at the internal and external stakeholders, viz., workers and project-affected community. The analysis reveals much higher occurrences of benefits for the affected community compared to those relating to the workers. The project proponents have highlighted the social relevance of projects mostly through ‘trickle down benefits’ – that may possibly accrue to the affected communities due to project investment – as compared to ‘co-created benefits’ – that empower the affected communities but require a deeper understanding of their needs and aspirations. ‘Local employment’ and ‘local business and economic growth’ are the most common benefits across projects. Three areas of improvement have been suggested in the benefits formulation process from a SS perspective – mandating worker-specific benefits, more focus on co-created benefits and specifying numeric measures of benefits along with timelines, to facilitate assessment of actual benefits realization during project implementation and operation phases. This study contributes to research literature on sustainable project management. Its findings offer useful implications for researchers, policymakers and project proponent organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建设项目效益制定:社会可持续性视角下的探索性研究
现有的项目管理文献表明,项目利益管理(PBM)可以通过为更广泛的项目利益相关者制定利益来促进社会可持续性(SS)。然而,缺乏关于福利制定中SS考虑的实际程度的经验证据,特别是来自印度等大型发展中经济体的经验证据。为了填补这一空白,我们对80个建设项目的PBM计划进行了以ss为中心的分析,使用内容分析来确定针对内部和外部利益相关者(即工人和受项目影响的社区)的利益。分析显示,与工人相关的福利相比,受影响社区的福利发生率要高得多。与“共同创造的利益”相比,项目的支持者强调了项目的社会相关性,主要是通过“涓滴效应”——由于项目投资可能会给受影响社区带来好处——而“共同创造的利益”——赋予受影响社区权力,但需要更深入地了解他们的需求和愿望。“当地就业”和“当地商业和经济增长”是各个项目最常见的好处。从SS的角度来看,在福利制定过程中提出了三个改进领域-强制规定特定于工人的福利,更加关注共同创造的福利,并指定福利的数字度量和时间表,以促进在项目实施和运营阶段对实际效益实现的评估。本研究对可持续项目管理的研究文献有所贡献。研究结果为研究人员、政策制定者和项目支持组织提供了有用的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
31.20%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Fintech Innovation Adoption in the Digital Payments Landscape Amidst the Pandemic: Empirical Evidence and Future Outlook Do Tragic Events Make Investors More Pro-social? Evidence from Japan Alliance or Association? Exploring the Effect of Work–Family Balance on Workplace Well-being, and the Mediating Effect of Work Attitudes Do Retail Evolution Theories Explain Wholesalers’ Responses in Emerging Economies? Evidence from a Wholesale Market in Northern India Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1