Comparative assessment of biofilm sampling methods on stainless steel surfaces in a CDC biofilm reactor

Biofilms Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.5194/biofilms9-136
Nissa Niboucha, C. Goetz, J. Jean
{"title":"Comparative assessment of biofilm sampling methods on stainless steel surfaces in a CDC biofilm reactor","authors":"Nissa Niboucha, C. Goetz, J. Jean","doi":"10.5194/biofilms9-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of biofilms on stainless steel surfaces in the dairy industry greatly limits the efficiency of the cleaning procedures. The matrix of extracellular polymeric substances produced by the embedded bacteria is largely responsible for this irreversible binding. Therefore, to detach the biofilm in its entirety from the surface for microbiological identification and physico-chemical characterization is limited with the classical methods commonly used for surface sampling such as swabbing. The objective of this study is to optimize an extraction technique of biofilm formed using a dynamic CDC bioreactor system by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from the dairy industry during a biofilm issue. Three methods: swabbing, scraping and sonic brushing were tested in order to determine which one of these techniques allows a better recovery of the biofilm. They were also compared to sonication which is the standard method established by ASTM International. The results demonstrated that the total viable counts obtained by scraping (8.65 ± 0.07 CFU/cm2) were not significantly different from those achieved by sonication (8.74 ± 0.06 CFU/cm2) in contrast to the other two approaches, while scanning electron microscopy showed an effective removal of biofilms from surfaces by sonic brushing. In conclusion, other combinations including brushing, sonication and/or scraping must be investigated for representative sampling of biofilm on the surfaces of dairy plants.","PeriodicalId":87392,"journal":{"name":"Biofilms","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/biofilms9-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of biofilms on stainless steel surfaces in the dairy industry greatly limits the efficiency of the cleaning procedures. The matrix of extracellular polymeric substances produced by the embedded bacteria is largely responsible for this irreversible binding. Therefore, to detach the biofilm in its entirety from the surface for microbiological identification and physico-chemical characterization is limited with the classical methods commonly used for surface sampling such as swabbing. The objective of this study is to optimize an extraction technique of biofilm formed using a dynamic CDC bioreactor system by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from the dairy industry during a biofilm issue. Three methods: swabbing, scraping and sonic brushing were tested in order to determine which one of these techniques allows a better recovery of the biofilm. They were also compared to sonication which is the standard method established by ASTM International. The results demonstrated that the total viable counts obtained by scraping (8.65 ± 0.07 CFU/cm2) were not significantly different from those achieved by sonication (8.74 ± 0.06 CFU/cm2) in contrast to the other two approaches, while scanning electron microscopy showed an effective removal of biofilms from surfaces by sonic brushing. In conclusion, other combinations including brushing, sonication and/or scraping must be investigated for representative sampling of biofilm on the surfaces of dairy plants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CDC生物膜反应器中不锈钢表面生物膜取样方法的比较评价
乳制品工业中不锈钢表面存在的生物膜极大地限制了清洁程序的效率。嵌入细菌产生的细胞外聚合物基质在很大程度上负责这种不可逆的结合。因此,将生物膜从表面完全分离以进行微生物鉴定和物理化学表征受到通常用于表面采样的经典方法(如拭子)的限制。本研究的目的是优化在生物膜问题期间使用动态CDC生物反应器系统由从乳制品工业分离的荧光假单胞菌形成的生物膜的提取技术。测试了三种方法:擦洗、刮擦和声波刷,以确定哪种技术可以更好地回收生物膜。它们还与超声处理进行了比较,超声处理是ASTM国际标准方法。结果表明,与其他两种方法相比,刮除获得的总活菌数(8.65±0.07 CFU/cm2)与超声处理获得的总存活菌数(8.74±0.06 CFU/cm 2)没有显著差异,而扫描电子显微镜显示,通过声波刷洗可以有效地去除表面的生物膜。总之,必须研究其他组合,包括刷洗、超声处理和/或刮擦,以对乳制品植物表面的生物膜进行代表性采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global analyses imply that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia biofilms are phenotypically highly diverse despite a common transcriptome profile BiofilmQ, a software tool for quantiative image analysis of microbial biofilm communities Monitoring and quantification of bioelectrochemical biofilms by means of OCT in novel and customized reactor-setups Biofilm and productivity-associated community changes in serial-transfer experiments in heterogeneous liquid microcosms Heterogeneities in biofilms from clinical isolates under flow conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1