Quantifying change of direction load using positional data from small-sided games in soccer

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Science and Medicine in Football Pub Date : 2021-04-06 DOI:10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382
B. Merks, W. Frencken, A. R. Den Otter, Michael Brink
{"title":"Quantifying change of direction load using positional data from small-sided games in soccer","authors":"B. Merks, W. Frencken, A. R. Den Otter, Michael Brink","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rapid changes in velocity and direction place high mechanical loads on players, but are ignored in commonly used load indicators. Purpose Quantifying change of direction (COD) load through positional data from small-sided games (SSG) and assess its criterion and construct validity. Methods Elite male youth soccer players (n = 25, 16.8 ± 1.3 years) played three SSG (5v5, 5×4 min) with different field dimensions (small [40×30 m], medium [55×38 m], large [70×45 m]). Positional data of the players was obtained with a Local Position Measurement system. COD load (AU) was quantified based on the combination of velocity and change in heading direction. Additionally, total distance covered, running distance, acceleration count, deceleration count, and Rating of Perceived Exertion were measured. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating COD load and the load indicators. Construct validity was determined by testing the differences between the SSG field dimensions. Results Strong correlations were determined between COD load and total distance covered (r = 0.74, p < .01) and running distance (r = 0.84, p < .01). Middle and large field size resulted in highest COD load (p < .05). Conclusion These results suggest that the COD load measure shows sufficient criterion and construct validity.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"6 1","pages":"234 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1912382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rapid changes in velocity and direction place high mechanical loads on players, but are ignored in commonly used load indicators. Purpose Quantifying change of direction (COD) load through positional data from small-sided games (SSG) and assess its criterion and construct validity. Methods Elite male youth soccer players (n = 25, 16.8 ± 1.3 years) played three SSG (5v5, 5×4 min) with different field dimensions (small [40×30 m], medium [55×38 m], large [70×45 m]). Positional data of the players was obtained with a Local Position Measurement system. COD load (AU) was quantified based on the combination of velocity and change in heading direction. Additionally, total distance covered, running distance, acceleration count, deceleration count, and Rating of Perceived Exertion were measured. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating COD load and the load indicators. Construct validity was determined by testing the differences between the SSG field dimensions. Results Strong correlations were determined between COD load and total distance covered (r = 0.74, p < .01) and running distance (r = 0.84, p < .01). Middle and large field size resulted in highest COD load (p < .05). Conclusion These results suggest that the COD load measure shows sufficient criterion and construct validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用小型足球比赛的位置数据量化方向负荷的变化
摘要速度和方向的快速变化给玩家带来了很高的机械负荷,但在常用的负荷指标中却被忽略了。目的通过小边博弈(SSG)的位置数据量化方向变化(COD)负荷,并评估其标准和结构的有效性。方法优秀男青年足球运动员(n=25,16.8±1.3岁)在不同场地尺寸(小[40×30m],中[55×38m],大[70×45m])进行3次SSG(5v5,5×4min)的比赛。球员的位置数据是用局部位置测量系统获得的。COD负荷(AU)基于速度和航向变化的组合进行量化。此外,还测量了总行驶距离、跑步距离、加速度计数、减速度计数和感知用力评分。通过相关COD负荷和负荷指标来评估标准的有效性。通过测试SSG场维度之间的差异来确定结构的有效性。结果COD负荷与总覆盖距离(r=0.74,p<0.01)和跑步距离(r=0.84,p<0.01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Measures of (injury and illness) occurrence: a primer on epidemiological concepts and terminology for authors. The maturity status but not the relative age influences elite young football players’ physical performance Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players Author reply to Weaving et al.: comment on: ‘A contemporary multi-modal mechanical approach to training monitoring in elite professional soccer: a mathematical problem?’ The influence of relative playing area and player numerical imbalance on physical and perceptual demands in soccer small-sided game formats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1