Preferences of patients with palliative care needs and their families for engagement with service improvement work within the hospital setting: A qualitative study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1177/02692163221100108
Claudia Virdun, T. Luckett, K. Lorenz, P. Davidson, J. Phillips
{"title":"Preferences of patients with palliative care needs and their families for engagement with service improvement work within the hospital setting: A qualitative study","authors":"Claudia Virdun, T. Luckett, K. Lorenz, P. Davidson, J. Phillips","doi":"10.1177/02692163221100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of involving patients and families with lived experiences of illness in healthcare service quality improvement, research and implementation initiatives. Ensuring input from people with palliative care needs is important, but how to enable this is not well understood. Aim: To seek the perspectives of Australian patients with palliative care needs, and their family members, to elicit their views on how to best contribute to inpatient palliative care quality improvement initiatives. Design: An exploratory qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Eligible participants were adult patients with palliative care needs receiving care within a hospital setting, and their family members. Recruitment occurred through: five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia; and snowballing. Results: Fifty participants took part (21 patients and 29 family members). Results confirmed four themes: (1) Mechanisms for providing feedback about care quality need to be supportive and individualised; (2) The clinician-patient/family power imbalance makes real time feedback challenging to provide; (3) Willingness to contribute varies according to diagnosis, timing and role and (4) Face to face feedback is preferred for health service improvement work. Conclusions: Enabling meaningful consumer input to quality improvement requires careful consideration due to the unique requirements of the palliative care population. Embedding tailored outcome and experience measures to inform real-time care provision coupled with focussed opportunities for input into service improvement may best foster improvements in inpatient palliative care, founded in what matters most for people requiring this care.","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"1129 - 1139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221100108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of involving patients and families with lived experiences of illness in healthcare service quality improvement, research and implementation initiatives. Ensuring input from people with palliative care needs is important, but how to enable this is not well understood. Aim: To seek the perspectives of Australian patients with palliative care needs, and their family members, to elicit their views on how to best contribute to inpatient palliative care quality improvement initiatives. Design: An exploratory qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Eligible participants were adult patients with palliative care needs receiving care within a hospital setting, and their family members. Recruitment occurred through: five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia; and snowballing. Results: Fifty participants took part (21 patients and 29 family members). Results confirmed four themes: (1) Mechanisms for providing feedback about care quality need to be supportive and individualised; (2) The clinician-patient/family power imbalance makes real time feedback challenging to provide; (3) Willingness to contribute varies according to diagnosis, timing and role and (4) Face to face feedback is preferred for health service improvement work. Conclusions: Enabling meaningful consumer input to quality improvement requires careful consideration due to the unique requirements of the palliative care population. Embedding tailored outcome and experience measures to inform real-time care provision coupled with focussed opportunities for input into service improvement may best foster improvements in inpatient palliative care, founded in what matters most for people requiring this care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有姑息治疗需求的患者及其家人在医院环境中参与服务改善工作的偏好:一项定性研究
背景:越来越多的人认识到在医疗保健服务质量改善、研究和实施倡议中涉及患者和有疾病生活经历的家庭的重要性。确保有姑息治疗需求的人的投入很重要,但如何做到这一点尚不清楚。目的:寻求有姑息治疗需求的澳大利亚患者及其家属的观点,以征求他们对如何最好地促进住院姑息治疗质量改善的看法。设计:一项探索性质的研究,采用半结构化访谈。环境/参与者:符合条件的参与者是在医院环境中接受姑息治疗需求的成年患者及其家属。招聘通过以下途径进行:澳大利亚新南威尔士州的五家医院;和滚雪球。结果:共50人(患者21人,家属29人)。结果证实了四个主题:(1)提供护理质量反馈的机制需要支持和个性化;(2)临床-患者/家庭权力失衡使得实时反馈难以提供;(3)贡献意愿因诊断、时间和角色的不同而不同;(4)在卫生服务改进工作中,更倾向于面对面的反馈。结论:由于姑息治疗人群的独特需求,使有意义的消费者投入到质量改进中需要仔细考虑。将量身定制的结果和经验措施纳入实时护理提供的信息,再加上为改善服务提供集中的投入机会,可能会最好地促进住院姑息治疗的改善,这是建立在对需要这种护理的人最重要的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Response to letters about "Palliative care and assisted dying: Uneasy bedfellows". Principles for developing, undertaking, and reporting research with minority ethnic populations in palliative and end of life care: A modified Delphi study. A narrow view of palliative care and assisted dying. Palliative care and assisted dying: An Australian experience that these can become accustomed bedfellows. Palliative management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A practice review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1