Effects of feeding lambs fresh versus dried Puccinellia tenuiflora (Griesb.) Scribn. & Merr. on water and nutrient intake and apparent digestibility

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Grassland Science Pub Date : 2021-01-21 DOI:10.1111/grs.12321
Rongzhen Zhong, Long Cheng, Yi Fang, Zelin Li, Vida Lamptey, Daowei Zhou
{"title":"Effects of feeding lambs fresh versus dried Puccinellia tenuiflora (Griesb.) Scribn. & Merr. on water and nutrient intake and apparent digestibility","authors":"Rongzhen Zhong,&nbsp;Long Cheng,&nbsp;Yi Fang,&nbsp;Zelin Li,&nbsp;Vida Lamptey,&nbsp;Daowei Zhou","doi":"10.1111/grs.12321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective was to investigate effects of feeding lambs fresh versus dried <i>Puccinellia. tenuiflora</i> (Griesb.) Scribn. &amp; Merr. on nutrient and water intake and apparent digestibility. Twenty-four lambs were offered fresh or dried (48 hr) grass. The dry matter (DM) content of fresh grass was 65% of dried grass and the neutral detergent fiber exclude ash (aNDFom) content of fresh grass was 87% of dried grass, whereas the metabolizable energy concentration of two forages was similar. Lambs eating fresh grass had higher (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) DM intake (944 versus 837 g DM day<sup>−1</sup> sheep<sup>−1</sup>), metabolizable energy intake (9.1 versus 7.9 MJ day<sup>-1</sup>sheep<sup>−1</sup>), and crude protein intake (86 versus 75 g day<sup>-1</sup> sheep<sup>−1</sup>) than those eating dried grass. However, there was no significant difference between treatments in drinking water intake, fecal nutrient output or nutrient digestibility. In conclusion, feeding lambs fresh <i>P. tenuiflora</i> improved voluntary feed intake without depressing nutrient digestibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"67 4","pages":"386-388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/grs.12321","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to investigate effects of feeding lambs fresh versus dried Puccinellia. tenuiflora (Griesb.) Scribn. & Merr. on nutrient and water intake and apparent digestibility. Twenty-four lambs were offered fresh or dried (48 hr) grass. The dry matter (DM) content of fresh grass was 65% of dried grass and the neutral detergent fiber exclude ash (aNDFom) content of fresh grass was 87% of dried grass, whereas the metabolizable energy concentration of two forages was similar. Lambs eating fresh grass had higher (p < .05) DM intake (944 versus 837 g DM day−1 sheep−1), metabolizable energy intake (9.1 versus 7.9 MJ day-1sheep−1), and crude protein intake (86 versus 75 g day-1 sheep−1) than those eating dried grass. However, there was no significant difference between treatments in drinking water intake, fecal nutrient output or nutrient digestibility. In conclusion, feeding lambs fresh P. tenuiflora improved voluntary feed intake without depressing nutrient digestibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲜鲜与干鲜薄茅对羔羊饲粮的影响Scribn。和稳定。水和营养物质的摄取量及表观消化率
目的是研究饲喂羔羊新鲜与干燥的普契利亚的效果。tenuiflora (Griesb)。Scribn。,稳定。营养和水分摄取量及表观消化率。24只羔羊饲喂新鲜或干草(48小时)。鲜草的干物质(DM)含量为干草的65%,中性洗涤纤维不含灰分(aNDFom)含量为干草的87%,两种牧草的代谢能浓度相近。吃新鲜草的羔羊(p <(0.05) DM摄入量(944对837 g DM -1羊-1)、代谢能摄入量(9.1对7.9 MJ -1羊-1)和粗蛋白质摄入量(86对75 g -1羊-1)。但在饮水量、粪便营养物质排泄量和营养物质消化率方面,各处理间无显著差异。综上所述,饲喂新鲜tenuiflora可以提高羔羊的自愿采食量,但不会降低营养物质的消化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cattle dung detection in pastures from drone images using YOLOv5 Potassium fertilization and defoliation intensity effects on forage characteristics of “BRS Zuri” guineagrass Phylogenomic identification and overexpression of plant size–related genes in Setaria viridis and rice Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1