Communicating the unknown

IF 1.6 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Corpus Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI:10.1075/ijcl.21096.mul
Marcus Müller, Sabine Bartsch, J. Zinn
{"title":"Communicating the unknown","authors":"Marcus Müller, Sabine Bartsch, J. Zinn","doi":"10.1075/ijcl.21096.mul","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents an annotation approach to examine uncertainty in British and German newspaper articles on the\n coronavirus pandemic. We develop a tagset in an interdisciplinary team from corpus linguistics and sociology. After working out a\n gold standard on a pilot corpus, we apply the annotation to the entire corpus drawing on an “annotation-by-query” approach in\n CQPWeb, based on uncertainty constructions that have been extracted from the gold standard data. The\n annotated data are then evaluated and sociologically contextualised. On this basis, we study the development of uncertainty\n markers in the period under study and compare media discourses in Germany and the UK. Our findings reflect the different courses\n of the pandemic in Germany and the UK as well as the different political responses, media traditions and cultural concerns: While\n markers of fear are more important in British discourse, we see a steadily increasing level of disagreement in German discourse.\n Other forms of uncertainty such as ‘possibility’ or ‘probability’ are similarly frequent in both discourses.","PeriodicalId":46843,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21096.mul","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents an annotation approach to examine uncertainty in British and German newspaper articles on the coronavirus pandemic. We develop a tagset in an interdisciplinary team from corpus linguistics and sociology. After working out a gold standard on a pilot corpus, we apply the annotation to the entire corpus drawing on an “annotation-by-query” approach in CQPWeb, based on uncertainty constructions that have been extracted from the gold standard data. The annotated data are then evaluated and sociologically contextualised. On this basis, we study the development of uncertainty markers in the period under study and compare media discourses in Germany and the UK. Our findings reflect the different courses of the pandemic in Germany and the UK as well as the different political responses, media traditions and cultural concerns: While markers of fear are more important in British discourse, we see a steadily increasing level of disagreement in German discourse. Other forms of uncertainty such as ‘possibility’ or ‘probability’ are similarly frequent in both discourses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通未知
本文提出了一种注释方法来检验英国和德国报纸关于冠状病毒大流行的文章中的不确定性。我们在语料库语言学和社会学的跨学科团队中开发了一个标签集。在对试点语料库制定出金标准后,我们根据从金标准数据中提取的不确定性结构,在CQPWeb中采用“逐查询注释”方法,将注释应用于整个语料库。然后对注释后的数据进行评估,并对其进行社会学背景分析。在此基础上,我们研究了不确定性标记在研究期间的发展,并对德国和英国的媒体话语进行了比较。我们的研究结果反映了德国和英国疫情的不同过程,以及不同的政治反应、媒体传统和文化关切:虽然恐惧标记在英国话语中更重要,我们看到德国话语中的分歧程度在稳步上升。其他形式的不确定性,如“可能性”或“概率”,在这两种话语中同样频繁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (IJCL) publishes original research covering methodological, applied and theoretical work in any area of corpus linguistics. Through its focus on empirical language research, IJCL provides a forum for the presentation of new findings and innovative approaches in any area of linguistics (e.g. lexicology, grammar, discourse analysis, stylistics, sociolinguistics, morphology, contrastive linguistics), applied linguistics (e.g. language teaching, forensic linguistics), and translation studies. Based on its interest in corpus methodology, IJCL also invites contributions on the interface between corpus and computational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Review of Durrant (2023): Corpus linguistics for writing development Assessing the potential of LLM-assisted annotation for corpus-based pragmatics and discourse analysis Case and agreement variation in contact A user-friendly corpus tool for disciplinary data-driven learning Review of Flach & Hilpert (2022): Broadening the spectrum of corpus linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1