Cognitive test score and 25-Year mortality risk; Does race matter?

S. Assari
{"title":"Cognitive test score and 25-Year mortality risk; Does race matter?","authors":"S. Assari","doi":"10.32892/jmri.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Despite our knowledge on the effect of cognitive test score on subsequent risk of mortality, few studies have compared Blacks and Whites for this association. The current study was conducted on Black-White differences in the magnitude of the association between baseline cognitive test score and all-cause mortality in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States over 25 years. \nMethods: We used data of the Americans’ Changing Lives Study (ACL), 1986 – 2011, a national prospective cohort in U.S. The study followed 3,361 adults (2,205 White and 1,156 Blacks), age 25 and older, for up to 25 years. The independent variable was cognitive test score measured at baseline (1986) using the 4-item version of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, treated in two different ways (as a dichotomous and as a continuous variable). The dependent variable was time to death (due to all causes) during the follow up period. Covariates included baseline age, gender, education, income, number of chronic diseases, self-rated health, and depressive symptoms. Race (Black versus White) was the focal effect modifier. We used a series of Cox proportional hazards models in the total sample, and by race, in the absence and presence of health variables. \nResults: Overall, cognitive test score predicted mortality risk. A significant interaction was found between race and baseline cognitive test score suggesting that baseline cognitive test score has a weaker protective effect against all-cause mortality for Blacks in comparison to Whites. In race-stratified models, cognitive test score at baseline predicted risk of all-cause mortality for Whites but not Blacks, in the absence and presence of baseline socio-economic and health variables. The results were similar regardless of how we treated baseline cognitive test score. \nConclusions: In the United States, baseline cognitive test score has a weaker protective effect against all-cause mortality over a long period of time for Blacks than Whites. The finding is in line with the Minorities Diminished Returns theory and is probably due to structural and interpersonal racism.","PeriodicalId":73819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical research and innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical research and innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32892/jmri.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Despite our knowledge on the effect of cognitive test score on subsequent risk of mortality, few studies have compared Blacks and Whites for this association. The current study was conducted on Black-White differences in the magnitude of the association between baseline cognitive test score and all-cause mortality in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States over 25 years. Methods: We used data of the Americans’ Changing Lives Study (ACL), 1986 – 2011, a national prospective cohort in U.S. The study followed 3,361 adults (2,205 White and 1,156 Blacks), age 25 and older, for up to 25 years. The independent variable was cognitive test score measured at baseline (1986) using the 4-item version of the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, treated in two different ways (as a dichotomous and as a continuous variable). The dependent variable was time to death (due to all causes) during the follow up period. Covariates included baseline age, gender, education, income, number of chronic diseases, self-rated health, and depressive symptoms. Race (Black versus White) was the focal effect modifier. We used a series of Cox proportional hazards models in the total sample, and by race, in the absence and presence of health variables. Results: Overall, cognitive test score predicted mortality risk. A significant interaction was found between race and baseline cognitive test score suggesting that baseline cognitive test score has a weaker protective effect against all-cause mortality for Blacks in comparison to Whites. In race-stratified models, cognitive test score at baseline predicted risk of all-cause mortality for Whites but not Blacks, in the absence and presence of baseline socio-economic and health variables. The results were similar regardless of how we treated baseline cognitive test score. Conclusions: In the United States, baseline cognitive test score has a weaker protective effect against all-cause mortality over a long period of time for Blacks than Whites. The finding is in line with the Minorities Diminished Returns theory and is probably due to structural and interpersonal racism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知测试分数与25年死亡风险;种族重要吗?
目的:尽管我们知道认知测试分数对随后死亡风险的影响,但很少有研究比较黑人和白人的这种关联。目前的研究是对基线认知测试分数与全因死亡率之间的关联程度的黑白差异进行的,研究对象是25年以上的美国成年人的全国代表性样本。方法:我们使用了1986 - 2011年美国人改变生活研究(ACL)的数据,这是一项美国全国前瞻性队列研究,该研究随访了3361名25岁及以上的成年人(2205名白人和1156名黑人),时间长达25年。自变量为基线(1986年)的认知测试分数,使用四项版本的简短便携式精神状态问卷,以两种不同的方式处理(作为二分法和作为连续变量)。因变量为随访期间的死亡时间(由于各种原因)。协变量包括基线年龄、性别、教育程度、收入、慢性病数量、自评健康状况和抑郁症状。种族(黑与白)是焦点效果调节器。我们在总样本、种族、健康变量的缺失和存在情况下使用了一系列Cox比例风险模型。结果:总体而言,认知测试分数预测死亡风险。种族和基线认知测试分数之间存在显著的相互作用,表明基线认知测试分数对黑人全因死亡率的保护作用弱于白人。在种族分层模型中,在缺乏和存在基线社会经济和健康变量的情况下,基线认知测试分数预测白人而非黑人的全因死亡率风险。无论我们如何处理基线认知测试分数,结果都是相似的。结论:在美国,与白人相比,基线认知测试分数在很长一段时间内对黑人全因死亡率的保护作用较弱。这一发现与少数群体收益递减理论一致,可能是由于结构性和人际种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Revolutionizing Healthcare for Improved Patient Outcomes Low back pain oswestry disability index changes following 8-week movement proficiency exercise program – A retrospective cohort study The clinical and subjective outcomes associated with spinal manipulation: A case study A novel approach of harvesting concentrated plasma-rich fibrin (PRF) with increased platelet count The kaleidoscope of autoimmunity: A report of 10 cases of multiple autoimmune syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1