Risk assessment of solid desiccant dehydration package system using safety integrity level‐based safety instrumented system design approach

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety Progress Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1002/prs.12518
Sanghyun Park, Tae Hee Lee, Kwangu Kang, Hyonjeong Noh, Hyungwoo Kim, Jaewon Oh, Kyong-Hwan Kim, Su-gil Cho
{"title":"Risk assessment of solid desiccant dehydration package system using safety integrity level‐based safety instrumented system design approach","authors":"Sanghyun Park, Tae Hee Lee, Kwangu Kang, Hyonjeong Noh, Hyungwoo Kim, Jaewon Oh, Kyong-Hwan Kim, Su-gil Cho","doi":"10.1002/prs.12518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dehydration package system plays an important role in the stable process operation and production of high‐quality liquefied natural gas by removing water, which is essential for natural gas production. However, as this system operates under various conditions with chemicals, there are threats to safety from potential hazards within the system. Therefore, ensuring system safety can significantly impact the reliable operation of process plants. This study aims to assess the risk of the dehydration package system through the safety integrity level (SIL)‐based safety instrumented system (SIS) design approach as suggested in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61,508/61511 standards. Fourteen major hazards requiring recommendations were identified for improving safety through the hazard and operability study (HAZOP). The three major hazards were valve malfunction and gas heater/cooler control failure. Twenty‐one safety instrumented functions (SIFs) in all study nodes were suggested as recommendations to improve safety. Using layers of protection analysis (LOPA), the SIL allocation of the 21 SIFs was performed reasonably with process risks and safeguards. The PDS method was adopted for SIS design and verification, with SIL analysis performed for all the SISs. The results showed that SISs of the dehydration package system satisfied the required SILs.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dehydration package system plays an important role in the stable process operation and production of high‐quality liquefied natural gas by removing water, which is essential for natural gas production. However, as this system operates under various conditions with chemicals, there are threats to safety from potential hazards within the system. Therefore, ensuring system safety can significantly impact the reliable operation of process plants. This study aims to assess the risk of the dehydration package system through the safety integrity level (SIL)‐based safety instrumented system (SIS) design approach as suggested in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61,508/61511 standards. Fourteen major hazards requiring recommendations were identified for improving safety through the hazard and operability study (HAZOP). The three major hazards were valve malfunction and gas heater/cooler control failure. Twenty‐one safety instrumented functions (SIFs) in all study nodes were suggested as recommendations to improve safety. Using layers of protection analysis (LOPA), the SIL allocation of the 21 SIFs was performed reasonably with process risks and safeguards. The PDS method was adopted for SIS design and verification, with SIL analysis performed for all the SISs. The results showed that SISs of the dehydration package system satisfied the required SILs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于安全完整性水平的安全仪表系统设计方法对固体干燥剂脱水包装系统的风险评估
脱水包系统在稳定的工艺运行和通过脱水生产高品质液化天然气方面发挥着重要作用,而脱水包系统对天然气生产至关重要。然而,由于该系统在含有化学品的各种条件下运行,系统内的潜在危险对安全构成威胁。因此,确保系统安全会对工艺装置的可靠运行产生重大影响。本研究旨在通过国际电工委员会(IEC)61508/61511标准中建议的基于安全完整性等级(SIL)的安全仪表系统(SIS)设计方法来评估脱水包系统的风险。通过危险和可操作性研究(HAZOP),确定了14个需要建议的主要危险,以提高安全性。三大危险是阀门故障和气体加热器/冷却器控制故障。建议所有研究节点中的21个安全仪表功能(SIF)作为提高安全性的建议。使用保护层分析(LOPA),合理地执行了21个SIF的SIL分配,并考虑了过程风险和保障措施。SIS设计和验证采用PDS方法,对所有SIS进行SIL分析。结果表明,脱水包装系统的SIS满足要求的SIL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety Progress
Process Safety Progress 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.
期刊最新文献
Numerical study of failure modes of hazardous material tanks exposed to fire accidents in the process industry So, you cannot vent: A deep dive into other explosion protection methods Risk and consequence analysis of ammonia storage units in a nuclear fuel cycle facility Diagnosing electrostatic problems and hazards in industrial processes: Case studies Numerical simulation study on propane gas leakage and diffusion law in slope terrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1