The Diplomacy of Military Assistance: The Royal Navy Training Team and the Nigerian Civil War

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY Diplomacy & Statecraft Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09592296.2023.2239640
M. Wyss
{"title":"The Diplomacy of Military Assistance: The Royal Navy Training Team and the Nigerian Civil War","authors":"M. Wyss","doi":"10.1080/09592296.2023.2239640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article studies the Anglo-Nigerian negotiations for a Royal Navy training team during the Nigerian Civil War against the background of Africa’s ‘phoney’ Cold War and Britain’s global strategic withdrawal. This allows it to show Britain’s diplomatic manoeuvres to simultaneously prevent provoking debilitating opposition against its tightrope policy of supporting Federal Nigeria against Biafra and safeguard its significant, predominantly economic – particularly oil – interests in Nigeria. Initially inconvenienced by the Nigerian request for a naval training team, British policymakers gradually agreed to send one after the war, then promised to do so already before, and, after the foreign policy establishment had overcome the Ministry of Defence’s resistance, finally sent out Royal Navy officers to Nigeria before the end of hostilities. In this process, the Nigerians had allies in the British High Commission in Lagos and the Foreign (and Commonwealth) Office, as well as substantial leverage as a result of Indian and Soviet competition in the Nigerian market for military assistance. Yet this leverage was mitigated by the Federals’ preference for British over Indian military assistance, and fear of becoming too reliant on Moscow. Not only in the British, but also in the Nigerian case, diplomatic concerns thus outweighed the military rationale for the naval training team, and this ‘diplomacy of military assistance’ contrasts with the basic tenor of the theoretical literature on military assistance in civil wars.","PeriodicalId":44804,"journal":{"name":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","volume":"34 1","pages":"491 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2023.2239640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article studies the Anglo-Nigerian negotiations for a Royal Navy training team during the Nigerian Civil War against the background of Africa’s ‘phoney’ Cold War and Britain’s global strategic withdrawal. This allows it to show Britain’s diplomatic manoeuvres to simultaneously prevent provoking debilitating opposition against its tightrope policy of supporting Federal Nigeria against Biafra and safeguard its significant, predominantly economic – particularly oil – interests in Nigeria. Initially inconvenienced by the Nigerian request for a naval training team, British policymakers gradually agreed to send one after the war, then promised to do so already before, and, after the foreign policy establishment had overcome the Ministry of Defence’s resistance, finally sent out Royal Navy officers to Nigeria before the end of hostilities. In this process, the Nigerians had allies in the British High Commission in Lagos and the Foreign (and Commonwealth) Office, as well as substantial leverage as a result of Indian and Soviet competition in the Nigerian market for military assistance. Yet this leverage was mitigated by the Federals’ preference for British over Indian military assistance, and fear of becoming too reliant on Moscow. Not only in the British, but also in the Nigerian case, diplomatic concerns thus outweighed the military rationale for the naval training team, and this ‘diplomacy of military assistance’ contrasts with the basic tenor of the theoretical literature on military assistance in civil wars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事援助外交:皇家海军训练队与尼日利亚内战
本文研究了在非洲“假”冷战和英国全球战略撤军的背景下,尼日利亚内战期间英国与尼日利亚谈判组建皇家海军训练队的过程。这让它得以展示英国的外交手腕,既能防止激起反对其支持联邦尼日利亚对抗比夫拉的走钢丝政策的削弱性反对,又能保护其在尼日利亚的重要、主要是经济利益——尤其是石油利益。起初,尼日利亚要求派遣一支海军训练小组,英国决策者对此感到不便,但战后他们逐渐同意派遣一支,并在之前就承诺这样做,在外交政策机构克服了国防部的阻力后,最终在战争结束前向尼日利亚派遣了皇家海军军官。在这个过程中,尼日利亚在拉各斯的英国高级专员公署和外交(和联邦)办公室有盟友,而且由于印度和苏联在尼日利亚军事援助市场上的竞争,尼日利亚人有很大的影响力。然而,由于联邦政府更倾向于英国而不是印度的军事援助,以及担心变得过于依赖莫斯科,这种影响力减弱了。不仅在英国,而且在尼日利亚的情况下,外交方面的考虑因此超过了海军训练小组的军事理由,这种“军事援助外交”与内战中军事援助理论文献的基本基调形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
“I Have Concluded That the US Government Will Adopt a New Focus in Its Policies Towards the Government of South Africa.” President Jimmy Carter and Apartheid South Africa The ‘US Factor’ in the Satō Administration’s Diplomacy in the Indonesia-Malaysia Conflict, 1964-1966 The 1941 Merano Conference: Building a Relationship Through Military Diplomacy An Indefinite Alliance? Article 13 and the North Atlantic Treaty David Owen, Human Rights, and the Remaking of British Foreign Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1