Motor Imagery Tasks Based Electroencephalogram Signals Classification Using Data-Driven Features

Vikram Singh Kardam , Sachin Taran , Anukul Pandey
{"title":"Motor Imagery Tasks Based Electroencephalogram Signals Classification Using Data-Driven Features","authors":"Vikram Singh Kardam ,&nbsp;Sachin Taran ,&nbsp;Anukul Pandey","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system consist of a variety of different applications based on the processing of electroencephalograph (EEG). One of the most significant categories are based on EEG signals segmentation for “Motor Imagery” (MI) classification.</p><p>When analytic methods use a fixed set of basis functions, the EEG signals frequently exhibit poor time-frequency localization. Additionally, these signals have a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and highly non-stationary characteristics. As a result, BCI systems frequently have high error rates and low task detection accuracy.</p><p>This work is aiming to introduce the adaptive and data-driven based feature extraction method for MI-tasks classification. In this regard, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and ensemble-EMD (EEMD) algorithms are explored. These data-driven decompositions decompose EEG signal into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs).</p><p>The IMFs are chosen to automatically reconstruct the EEG signal. The reconstructed EEG signal contains only information correlated to a specific motor imagery task and high SNR.</p><p>The time-domain features are extracted from both the algorithms and compared for the classification of right-hand and feet MI movements. The results have been compared to determine the suitability of each method. Different classifiers, including tree, naive bayes, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, ensemble average, and neural network (NN), have been tested for the proposed features in order to classify the features into right hand motor imagery and feet motor imagery tasks.</p><p>Our experimental results on the BNCI Horizon 2022 dataset show that the proposed method (EEMD) with three channels outperforms &gt; 15% with EMD based filtering with narrow NN based classification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system consist of a variety of different applications based on the processing of electroencephalograph (EEG). One of the most significant categories are based on EEG signals segmentation for “Motor Imagery” (MI) classification.

When analytic methods use a fixed set of basis functions, the EEG signals frequently exhibit poor time-frequency localization. Additionally, these signals have a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and highly non-stationary characteristics. As a result, BCI systems frequently have high error rates and low task detection accuracy.

This work is aiming to introduce the adaptive and data-driven based feature extraction method for MI-tasks classification. In this regard, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and ensemble-EMD (EEMD) algorithms are explored. These data-driven decompositions decompose EEG signal into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs).

The IMFs are chosen to automatically reconstruct the EEG signal. The reconstructed EEG signal contains only information correlated to a specific motor imagery task and high SNR.

The time-domain features are extracted from both the algorithms and compared for the classification of right-hand and feet MI movements. The results have been compared to determine the suitability of each method. Different classifiers, including tree, naive bayes, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, ensemble average, and neural network (NN), have been tested for the proposed features in order to classify the features into right hand motor imagery and feet motor imagery tasks.

Our experimental results on the BNCI Horizon 2022 dataset show that the proposed method (EEMD) with three channels outperforms > 15% with EMD based filtering with narrow NN based classification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于运动图像任务的数据驱动特征脑电信号分类
脑机接口(BCI)系统是基于脑电图(EEG)处理的多种不同的应用程序组成的。其中最重要的分类是基于脑电信号分割的“运动意象”分类。当分析方法使用一组固定的基函数时,脑电信号往往表现出较差的时频定位。此外,这些信号具有低信噪比(SNR)和高度非平稳特性。因此,BCI系统往往具有较高的错误率和较低的任务检测精度。本工作旨在引入基于自适应和数据驱动的特征提取方法用于mi任务分类。在这方面,研究了经验模态分解(EMD)和集成模态分解(EEMD)算法。这些数据驱动分解将脑电信号分解为内禀模态函数(IMFs)。选取相应的插值函数自动重构脑电信号。重构后的脑电信号只包含与特定运动想象任务相关的信息,信噪比较高。从两种算法中提取时域特征并进行比较,用于右手和脚的MI运动分类。对结果进行了比较,以确定每种方法的适用性。不同的分类器,包括树、朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机、k近邻、集成平均和神经网络(NN),已经对所提出的特征进行了测试,以便将特征分类为右手运动图像和脚运动图像任务。我们在BNCI Horizon 2022数据集上的实验结果表明,具有三个通道的方法(EEMD)优于>15%是基于EMD的滤波和基于狭义神经网络的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in neurodegenerative diseases Topic modeling of neuropsychiatric diseases related to gut microbiota and gut brain axis using artificial intelligence based BERTopic model on PubMed abstracts Brain network analysis in Parkinson's disease patients based on graph theory Exploring age-related functional brain changes during audio-visual integration tasks in early to mid-adulthood Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1