Suicide Prevention in Your Pocket: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Interventions for the Management of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000331
L. Jiménez-Muñoz, I. Peñuelas-Calvo, I. Díaz-Oliván, L. Gutiérrez-Rojas, E. Baca-García, A. Porras-Segovia
{"title":"Suicide Prevention in Your Pocket: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Interventions for the Management of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors","authors":"L. Jiménez-Muñoz, I. Peñuelas-Calvo, I. Díaz-Oliván, L. Gutiérrez-Rojas, E. Baca-García, A. Porras-Segovia","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background This study reviews the evidence on ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) for managing and preventing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Methods This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. We conducted a systematic literature search of five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane library. The most recent search date was 10 September 2021. Results After screening and full-text review, 27 studies were included, totaling 19 different interventions. Many of the available interventions have not yet been clinically tested. Those that have undergone effectiveness evaluation (10 interventions) showed good rates of effectiveness and feasibility, with some exceptions. The most widely used intervention model is the safety plan, which allows the user to implement coping and distracting strategies in case of suicidal ideation. Conclusions Ecological momentary interventions provide certain advantages, such as their wide availability, versatility, and potential for customization. These interventions can be useful complements to traditional care, especially in situations in which face-to-face care is not possible. Evidence on the effectiveness of such interventions is still scarce. Furthermore, barriers limiting implementation in clinical practice remain. The constant advance of technology means that these interventions have great potential for improvement in the coming years.","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Background This study reviews the evidence on ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) for managing and preventing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Methods This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. We conducted a systematic literature search of five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane library. The most recent search date was 10 September 2021. Results After screening and full-text review, 27 studies were included, totaling 19 different interventions. Many of the available interventions have not yet been clinically tested. Those that have undergone effectiveness evaluation (10 interventions) showed good rates of effectiveness and feasibility, with some exceptions. The most widely used intervention model is the safety plan, which allows the user to implement coping and distracting strategies in case of suicidal ideation. Conclusions Ecological momentary interventions provide certain advantages, such as their wide availability, versatility, and potential for customization. These interventions can be useful complements to traditional care, especially in situations in which face-to-face care is not possible. Evidence on the effectiveness of such interventions is still scarce. Furthermore, barriers limiting implementation in clinical practice remain. The constant advance of technology means that these interventions have great potential for improvement in the coming years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口袋里的自杀预防:自杀思想和行为管理的生态瞬时干预的系统回顾
背景本研究综述了生态瞬间干预(EMIs)在管理和预防自杀念头和行为方面的证据。方法本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。其协议已在普洛斯彼罗数据库中登记。我们对PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、PsycInfo和Cochrane图书馆这五个数据库进行了系统的文献检索。最近一次搜索日期是2021年9月10日。结果经过筛选和全文审查,纳入27项研究,共19种不同的干预措施。许多可用的干预措施尚未经过临床试验。经过有效性评估的干预措施(10项干预措施)显示出良好的有效性和可行性,但有一些例外。使用最广泛的干预模型是安全计划,它允许用户在出现自杀意念时实施应对和转移策略。结论生态瞬时干预具有广泛可用性、通用性和定制潜力等优势。这些干预措施可作为传统护理的有益补充,特别是在无法进行面对面护理的情况下。关于这类干预措施有效性的证据仍然很少。此外,限制在临床实践中实施的障碍仍然存在。技术的不断进步意味着这些干预措施在未来几年有很大的改进潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
期刊最新文献
Emotional Eating in Primary Care: Considerations for Assessment and Management. Lupus on the Mind: A Case of Psychosis in Uncontrolled Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Psychological Assessment for Gender-Affirming Care in Transgender and Nonbinary Youth: The Companionship Model. Announcing the Shelly F. Greenfield MD, MPH Award for Best Manuscript by an Early Career Author. Ketamine in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review: Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1