Alternative modernities and epistemic struggles for recognition in Turkish media: deconstructing Eurocentrism?

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Third World Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1080/01436597.2023.2223125
Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Elif Gençkal-Eroler
{"title":"Alternative modernities and epistemic struggles for recognition in Turkish media: deconstructing Eurocentrism?","authors":"Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Elif Gençkal-Eroler","doi":"10.1080/01436597.2023.2223125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The concept of modernity and its association with the West and secularism is being challenged with the rise of religious movements in the age of globalisation. This provides a fertile ground for alternative modernities, disconnected from the West and secularism, to surface. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the emergence of alternative modernities by drawing on insights from epistemic injustice and recognition theory, through an analysis of Turkish media outlets. Turkey serves as an illustrative case to examine the emergence of alternative modernities due to its long-standing tradition of incorporating Western modernity and its complex liminal identity between the boundaries of the East and the West. This paper argues that the period from 2005 to 2020 presented a window of opportunity for an alternative modernities paradigm to engage in epistemic struggles for recognition, supported by the ideological context of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi or AKP) government. This period paved the way for questioning the superiority and uniqueness of Western modernity. However, it also indicates the birth of a new form of epistemic injustice as counter-narratives defending the superiority of Islamic civilisation emerged, seeking to establish epistemic hegemony for Islam and its association with modernity.","PeriodicalId":48280,"journal":{"name":"Third World Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Third World Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2223125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The concept of modernity and its association with the West and secularism is being challenged with the rise of religious movements in the age of globalisation. This provides a fertile ground for alternative modernities, disconnected from the West and secularism, to surface. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the emergence of alternative modernities by drawing on insights from epistemic injustice and recognition theory, through an analysis of Turkish media outlets. Turkey serves as an illustrative case to examine the emergence of alternative modernities due to its long-standing tradition of incorporating Western modernity and its complex liminal identity between the boundaries of the East and the West. This paper argues that the period from 2005 to 2020 presented a window of opportunity for an alternative modernities paradigm to engage in epistemic struggles for recognition, supported by the ideological context of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi or AKP) government. This period paved the way for questioning the superiority and uniqueness of Western modernity. However, it also indicates the birth of a new form of epistemic injustice as counter-narratives defending the superiority of Islamic civilisation emerged, seeking to establish epistemic hegemony for Islam and its association with modernity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其媒体的另类现代性与认识论斗争:解构欧洲中心主义?
随着全球化时代宗教运动的兴起,现代性概念及其与西方和世俗主义的联系正受到挑战。这为与西方和世俗主义分离的另类现代性的出现提供了肥沃的土壤。本文通过对土耳其媒体的分析,借鉴了认识论的不公正和承认理论的见解,为另类现代性的出现提供了理论解释。土耳其作为一个例子来考察另类现代性的出现,这是由于其长期以来融合西方现代性的传统,以及东西方边界之间复杂的界限认同。本文认为,在正义与发展党(Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi或AKP)政府的意识形态背景的支持下,2005年至2020年这一时期为另一种现代性范式提供了一个机会之窗,以参与认识斗争。这一时期为质疑西方现代性的优越性和独特性铺平了道路。然而,随着捍卫伊斯兰文明优越性的反叙事的出现,它也表明了一种新形式的认识不公正的诞生,这种反叙事试图为伊斯兰及其与现代性的联系建立认识霸权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Third World Quarterly
Third World Quarterly DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Third World Quarterly ( TWQ ) is the leading journal of scholarship and policy in the field of international studies. For almost four decades it has set the agenda of the global debate on development discourses. As the most influential academic journal covering the emerging worlds, TWQ is at the forefront of analysis and commentary on fundamental issues of global concern. TWQ examines all the issues that affect the many Third Worlds and is not averse to publishing provocative and exploratory articles, especially if they have the merit of opening up emerging areas of research that have not been given sufficient attention. TWQ is a peer-reviewed journal that looks beyond strict "development studies", providing an alternative and over-arching reflective analysis of micro-economic and grassroot efforts of development practitioners and planners. It furnishes expert insight into crucial issues before they impinge upon global media attention. TWQ acts as an almanac linking the academic terrains of the various contemporary area studies - African, Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern - in an interdisciplinary manner with the publication of informative, innovative and investigative articles. Contributions are rigorously assessed by regional experts.
期刊最新文献
Southern agency in global norms creation: Bangladesh in the SDGs formulation process Decolonisation agriculture: challenging colonisation through the reconstruction of agriculture in Western Kurdistan (Rojava) White supremacy and the racial logic of the global preventing and countering violent extremism agenda Digital Mapuche activism between decolonisation and digital warfare Debunking the myth of Brazilian subimperialism during Lula and Dilma’s governments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1