Consequences of the Australian 2019/20 wildfires for sites important for biodiversity and other world heritage values

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Australian Zoologist Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.7882/az.2022.034
Michelle S. Ward, J. Watson, Aaron C. Greenville, G. Maurer, Stephanie J. Todd, William L. Geary, A. Tulloch
{"title":"Consequences of the Australian 2019/20 wildfires for sites important for biodiversity and other world heritage values","authors":"Michelle S. Ward, J. Watson, Aaron C. Greenville, G. Maurer, Stephanie J. Todd, William L. Geary, A. Tulloch","doi":"10.7882/az.2022.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 2019/20 wildfire season was devastating for Australia’s biodiversity and unprecedented in its extent and severity, yet the consequences for sites important for biodiversity and other world heritage values remain unknown. Here, we summarise the 2019/20 wildfire impacts on key sites set aside for, or identified as being important for, biodiversity, with specific reference to nationally designated protected areas, World Heritage Listings, and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). We also explore patterns between burn extent or severity, and underlying landscape characteristics. Over seven months, approximately 10 million hectares (ha) of native vegetation burned. Of these burned landscapes, ~3.2 million ha (41%) were within the Australian protected area estate (n = 815 and impacted >0.1% of each protected area). Six Australian World Heritage Listings were impacted by the 2019/20 wildfires, with the largest impact being in the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (680,000 ha or 67% was affected by the fires). The 2019/20 fires impacted over 2 million ha across 69 KBAs. Of these, 18 KBAs had >15% of their area burned. Critically, for the management of intact and recovering forests, we show that the degree of forest integrity and ecosystem intactness affected fire severity: more degraded forests and ecosystems experienced higher severity burns in the protected area estate and KBAs. Recovery for many of these places will require targeted effort and resources to help reduce the likelihood of future megafires, as well as increased resilience in the face of other catastrophic environmental events.","PeriodicalId":35849,"journal":{"name":"Australian Zoologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Zoologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2022.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2019/20 wildfire season was devastating for Australia’s biodiversity and unprecedented in its extent and severity, yet the consequences for sites important for biodiversity and other world heritage values remain unknown. Here, we summarise the 2019/20 wildfire impacts on key sites set aside for, or identified as being important for, biodiversity, with specific reference to nationally designated protected areas, World Heritage Listings, and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). We also explore patterns between burn extent or severity, and underlying landscape characteristics. Over seven months, approximately 10 million hectares (ha) of native vegetation burned. Of these burned landscapes, ~3.2 million ha (41%) were within the Australian protected area estate (n = 815 and impacted >0.1% of each protected area). Six Australian World Heritage Listings were impacted by the 2019/20 wildfires, with the largest impact being in the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (680,000 ha or 67% was affected by the fires). The 2019/20 fires impacted over 2 million ha across 69 KBAs. Of these, 18 KBAs had >15% of their area burned. Critically, for the management of intact and recovering forests, we show that the degree of forest integrity and ecosystem intactness affected fire severity: more degraded forests and ecosystems experienced higher severity burns in the protected area estate and KBAs. Recovery for many of these places will require targeted effort and resources to help reduce the likelihood of future megafires, as well as increased resilience in the face of other catastrophic environmental events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚2019/20年野火对生物多样性和其他世界遗产价值重要遗址的影响
2019/20年的野火季节对澳大利亚的生物多样性是毁灭性的,其程度和严重程度是前所未有的,但对生物多样性和其他世界遗产价值重要的遗址的后果仍然未知。在这里,我们总结了2019/20年野火对为生物多样性预留或被确定为对生物多样性重要的关键地点的影响,具体参考了国家指定的保护区、世界遗产名录和关键生物多样性区(KBA)。我们还探索了烧伤程度或严重程度与潜在景观特征之间的模式。在七个多月的时间里,大约1000万公顷的原生植被被烧毁。在这些被烧毁的景观中,约320万公顷(41%)位于澳大利亚保护区内(n=815,影响了每个保护区的0.1%以上)。2019/20年的野火影响了六个澳大利亚世界遗产名录,其中影响最大的是大蓝山世界遗产区(68万公顷,即67%受到火灾影响)。2019/20年的火灾影响了69个KBA的200多万公顷土地。其中,18个KBA的面积超过15%。至关重要的是,对于完整和恢复的森林的管理,我们表明,森林完整性和生态系统完整性的程度影响了火灾的严重程度:在保护区和KBA中,更多退化的森林和生态系统经历了更严重的烧伤。其中许多地方的恢复需要有针对性的努力和资源,以帮助降低未来发生特大火灾的可能性,并在面对其他灾难性环境事件时提高抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Zoologist
Australian Zoologist Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Royal Zoological Society publishes a fully refereed scientific journal, Australian Zoologist, specialising in topics relevant to Australian zoology. The Australian Zoologist was first published by the Society in 1914, making it the oldest Australian journal specialising in zoological topics. The scope of the journal has increased substantially in the last 20 years, and it now attracts papers on a wide variety of zoological, ecological and environmentally related topics. The RZS also publishes, as books, and the outcome of forums, which are run annually by the Society.
期刊最新文献
Biodiverse cities or green light for biological invasions? Koala density, habitat, conservation, and response to logging in eucalyptus forest; a review and critical evaluation of call monitoring Home-range positions in a bird community from south-eastern Australia - questions and answers Rat lungworm, Cryptosporidium and other zoonotic pathogens of Rattus rattus and native wildlife on Sydney's Northern beaches 1 Million Turtles: empowering communities to save Australian freshwater turtles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1