Does reporting quality affect systematic risk? Evidence from a regulatory lottery

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107116
Linus Siming
{"title":"Does reporting quality affect systematic risk? Evidence from a regulatory lottery","authors":"Linus Siming","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On June 1, 1976, the Swedish parliament voted on a legislative bill that, if approved, would have substantially increased the quality of the corporate information disclosed to the public. Since parliament was hung, the outcome of the vote was decided by a lottery. The winning lottery ticket was a “No”, which meant that the bill was rejected. I exploit this lottery as an exogenous event to study if reporting quality affects systematic risk. I find that the rejection of the bill resulted in a negative abnormal return that persisted in the following day. This result suggests that there is a causal relationship between reporting quality and equity prices through its impact on systematic risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425423000650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On June 1, 1976, the Swedish parliament voted on a legislative bill that, if approved, would have substantially increased the quality of the corporate information disclosed to the public. Since parliament was hung, the outcome of the vote was decided by a lottery. The winning lottery ticket was a “No”, which meant that the bill was rejected. I exploit this lottery as an exogenous event to study if reporting quality affects systematic risk. I find that the rejection of the bill resulted in a negative abnormal return that persisted in the following day. This result suggests that there is a causal relationship between reporting quality and equity prices through its impact on systematic risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报告质量是否会影响系统风险?来自监管彩票的证据
1976年6月1日,瑞典议会投票通过了一项立法法案,如果该法案获得批准,将大大提高向公众披露的公司信息的质量。由于议会处于悬浮状态,投票结果由摇号决定。中奖的彩票是“No”,这意味着该法案被拒绝了。我利用这种抽奖作为外生事件来研究报告质量是否会影响系统风险。我发现拒付导致了一个负的异常回报,并持续到第二天。这一结果表明,通过报告质量对系统性风险的影响,报告质量与股价之间存在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Attention to corporate disclosure and earnings Management: Evidence from downloads of SEC filings Government spending and CEO equity incentives: Evidence from changes in U.S. Senate committee chairs Window dressing on bank problem loans: Evidence from natural disaster responses An unintended consequence of raising public environmental awareness: Evidence from the release of the environmental documentary “Under the Dome” on earnings management Does company reputation matter for voluntary disclosure quality? evidence from management earnings forecasts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1