Curatorial practices and ‘intrinsically English’ art: The British pavilion at the Venice Biennale

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Museum History Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19369816.2023.2196650
Stefania Portinari
{"title":"Curatorial practices and ‘intrinsically English’ art: The British pavilion at the Venice Biennale","authors":"Stefania Portinari","doi":"10.1080/19369816.2023.2196650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT British artists have been a constant presence at the Venice Biennale from the very beginning in 1895, installed in the only existing pavilion alongside others international artists. In 1909, a dedicated British Pavilion was built in the Saint Elena Gardens. This paper charts the development of the British curatorial choices that have taken place at the Biennale since its outset. Rather than being a chronological history, it deals with aspects of power concerning the relationship between the authority of the British Pavilion's curatorial practices and those of the Biennale's curators and institution. The text highlights the peculiar political and managerial situation of the Venice Biennale, one that creates three levels of power confrontations. The first is between the structures of the Italian institution and those of the British Pavilion; the second is between the British government and the curators of its pavilion; and the third is between the curatorial choices taking place as part of the British Pavilion and those of other pavilions. This case study, which makes use of unpublished documents, highlights the singularities and commonalities of British curatorial practices at the Venice Biennale and offers the opportunity to reveal dialogues and tensions.","PeriodicalId":52057,"journal":{"name":"Museum History Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Museum History Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19369816.2023.2196650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT British artists have been a constant presence at the Venice Biennale from the very beginning in 1895, installed in the only existing pavilion alongside others international artists. In 1909, a dedicated British Pavilion was built in the Saint Elena Gardens. This paper charts the development of the British curatorial choices that have taken place at the Biennale since its outset. Rather than being a chronological history, it deals with aspects of power concerning the relationship between the authority of the British Pavilion's curatorial practices and those of the Biennale's curators and institution. The text highlights the peculiar political and managerial situation of the Venice Biennale, one that creates three levels of power confrontations. The first is between the structures of the Italian institution and those of the British Pavilion; the second is between the British government and the curators of its pavilion; and the third is between the curatorial choices taking place as part of the British Pavilion and those of other pavilions. This case study, which makes use of unpublished documents, highlights the singularities and commonalities of British curatorial practices at the Venice Biennale and offers the opportunity to reveal dialogues and tensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
策展实践与“本质上的英国”艺术:威尼斯双年展英国馆
摘要从1895年开始,英国艺术家就一直在威尼斯双年展上亮相,与其他国际艺术家一起被安置在现存唯一的展馆中。1909年,圣埃琳娜花园建造了一座专门的英国馆。本文描绘了自双年展开始以来英国策展选择的发展。它不是一部按时间顺序排列的历史,而是涉及权力的各个方面,涉及英国馆策展实践的权威与双年展策展人和机构的权威之间的关系。该文本强调了威尼斯双年展独特的政治和管理状况,其中产生了三个层面的权力对抗。第一个是在意大利机构和英国馆的结构之间;二是英国政府和展馆馆长之间的纠纷;第三个是作为英国馆的一部分和其他展馆的策展选择之间的选择。这项案例研究利用了未发表的文件,突出了英国在威尼斯双年展策展实践的独特性和共性,并为揭示对话和紧张关系提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The toxic museum: Berlin and beyond Money matters: ‘following the money’ to reconstruct Walter Rothschild’s ‘zoological enterprise’ and the history of the Zoological Museum Tring, 1889–1900 Harmful arrangements: Ethnography at the National Institute and racial violence in Washington, D.C., 1842–1864 The museum of the Roman-Christian necropolis of Tarragona in context Civic art galleries and interwar exhibition cultures in Britain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1