Quantitative PCR for the Diagnosis of HCMV Pneumonia in HSCT Recipients and Other Immunocompromised Hosts

IF 0.9 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Hemato Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.3390/hemato4010008
C. Berengua, R. Martino
{"title":"Quantitative PCR for the Diagnosis of HCMV Pneumonia in HSCT Recipients and Other Immunocompromised Hosts","authors":"C. Berengua, R. Martino","doi":"10.3390/hemato4010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pneumonia is among the most serious manifestations of HCMV infection, with high morbidity and mortality. Probable pneumonia is defined as the detection of HCMV in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) by viral isolation or DNA quantification (qPCR) combined with symptoms and/or signs of respiratory infection. However, currently, there is no reproducible and well-defined viral load (VL) from BAL that can reliably differentiate patients with pneumonia from the much more common detection of viral DNA in seropositive patients without true HCMV pneumonia. Several studies have been published with the aim of establishing an optimal VL for differentiating pneumonia from viral lung shedding. The aim of this review is to collect and analyze the methodology and the conclusions obtained in studies whose objectives included the correlation between HCMV VL in BAL and/or the plasma and the occurrence of HCMV pneumonia. For this purpose, a total of 14 articles have been included. There are some conclusions on which they all agree. PCR techniques were more sensitive and had a higher NPV than culture techniques but were less specific and had a low PPV. The mean HCMV loads in both BAL and the plasma were significantly higher in patients with pneumonitis than in those without. The HCMV load in patients with pneumonitis was higher in BAL than in the plasma, making qPCR in BAL a better predictor of HCMV pneumonitis than in the plasma. Nevertheless, this review highlights the difficulty of establishing a universal VL value, both in BAL and in the blood, to differentiate patients with HCMV pneumonia from those without. To complete the information available in these studies, prospective multicentre studies would be required. Methodologically, a large number of patients with HCMV pneumonitis would have to be included, and a subclassification of the type of immunosuppression of each patient should be made in order to obtain an optimal VL threshold in different host groups.","PeriodicalId":93705,"journal":{"name":"Hemato","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemato","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pneumonia is among the most serious manifestations of HCMV infection, with high morbidity and mortality. Probable pneumonia is defined as the detection of HCMV in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) by viral isolation or DNA quantification (qPCR) combined with symptoms and/or signs of respiratory infection. However, currently, there is no reproducible and well-defined viral load (VL) from BAL that can reliably differentiate patients with pneumonia from the much more common detection of viral DNA in seropositive patients without true HCMV pneumonia. Several studies have been published with the aim of establishing an optimal VL for differentiating pneumonia from viral lung shedding. The aim of this review is to collect and analyze the methodology and the conclusions obtained in studies whose objectives included the correlation between HCMV VL in BAL and/or the plasma and the occurrence of HCMV pneumonia. For this purpose, a total of 14 articles have been included. There are some conclusions on which they all agree. PCR techniques were more sensitive and had a higher NPV than culture techniques but were less specific and had a low PPV. The mean HCMV loads in both BAL and the plasma were significantly higher in patients with pneumonitis than in those without. The HCMV load in patients with pneumonitis was higher in BAL than in the plasma, making qPCR in BAL a better predictor of HCMV pneumonitis than in the plasma. Nevertheless, this review highlights the difficulty of establishing a universal VL value, both in BAL and in the blood, to differentiate patients with HCMV pneumonia from those without. To complete the information available in these studies, prospective multicentre studies would be required. Methodologically, a large number of patients with HCMV pneumonitis would have to be included, and a subclassification of the type of immunosuppression of each patient should be made in order to obtain an optimal VL threshold in different host groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量PCR在HSCT受体和其他免疫受损宿主HCMV肺炎诊断中的应用
肺炎是HCMV感染最严重的表现之一,发病率和死亡率都很高。可能的肺炎是指通过病毒分离或DNA定量(qPCR)结合呼吸道感染的症状和/或体征在支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)中检测到HCMV。然而,目前,BAL中没有可重复和明确定义的病毒载量(VL)可以可靠地将肺炎患者与血清阳性患者中更常见的病毒DNA检测区分开来,而血清阳性患者没有真正的HCMV肺炎。已经发表了几项研究,目的是建立区分肺炎和病毒性肺脱落的最佳VL。本综述的目的是收集和分析研究中获得的方法和结论,这些研究的目的包括BAL和/或血浆中的HCMV VL与HCMV肺炎发生之间的相关性。为此,共收录了14篇文章。有一些结论他们都同意。PCR技术比培养技术更敏感,NPV更高,但特异性较低,PPV较低。患有肺炎的患者BAL和血浆中的平均HCMV负荷显著高于没有肺炎的患者。肺炎患者的HCMV负荷在BAL中高于在血浆中,这使得BAL中的qPCR比在血浆中更好地预测HCMV肺炎。然而,这篇综述强调了在BAL和血液中建立通用VL值以区分HCMV肺炎患者和非HCMV肺炎的患者的困难。为了完成这些研究中可用的信息,需要进行前瞻性多中心研究。从方法上讲,必须包括大量HCMV肺炎患者,并对每个患者的免疫抑制类型进行亚类化,以便在不同宿主组中获得最佳VL阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Novel Anti-Cancer Agent, SpiD3, Is Cytotoxic in CLL Cells Resistant to Ibrutinib or Venetoclax. Synthetic Lethality Approaches in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Hemato Keeps You Updated on the Research in Hematology The Role of Platelet Molecules in Risk Stratification of Patients with COVID-19 Fibril-Forming Organelles in Mesangial Cells in Renal Biopsies from Patients with Light-Chain-Associated Amyloidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1