Results from a quasi-controlled trial of a “Coping with Voices” group. Part 2

Gordon Kay, E. Kendall, M. Slattery, Justin Scott, V. Gore-Jones, F. Dark
{"title":"Results from a quasi-controlled trial of a “Coping with Voices” group. Part 2","authors":"Gordon Kay, E. Kendall, M. Slattery, Justin Scott, V. Gore-Jones, F. Dark","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2021.1957993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background This is the second of two papers that investigated the effectiveness of a group-based program known as ‘Coping with Voices’. The first paper reported on the group facilitators experience of delivering the program. This second paper reports the findings from the participants. Method Of the 61 participants that gave informed consent to participate in the study 19 did not attend a group, so this provided a natural quasi-control group. The study compared pre and post primary measures for the 42 participants who attended a group. 29 group attendees also provided qualitative data. Secondary measures were measured longitudinally for all 61 participants. Individuals who participated in the program were compared to those individuals who did not. Results For the 42 voice hearers who attended Coping with Voices, the quantifiable data showed a significant reduction in negative beliefs about voices, voice severity, distress about voices and the perceived power of the voices. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive. The secondary measures show a significant reduction in the number of hospital admissions and an improvement in basis life skills for group attendees versus non-attendees at 12 months follow up. Discussion Overall, these findings suggest ‘Coping with Voices’ is feasible, acceptable and worthwhile.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2021.1957993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background This is the second of two papers that investigated the effectiveness of a group-based program known as ‘Coping with Voices’. The first paper reported on the group facilitators experience of delivering the program. This second paper reports the findings from the participants. Method Of the 61 participants that gave informed consent to participate in the study 19 did not attend a group, so this provided a natural quasi-control group. The study compared pre and post primary measures for the 42 participants who attended a group. 29 group attendees also provided qualitative data. Secondary measures were measured longitudinally for all 61 participants. Individuals who participated in the program were compared to those individuals who did not. Results For the 42 voice hearers who attended Coping with Voices, the quantifiable data showed a significant reduction in negative beliefs about voices, voice severity, distress about voices and the perceived power of the voices. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive. The secondary measures show a significant reduction in the number of hospital admissions and an improvement in basis life skills for group attendees versus non-attendees at 12 months follow up. Discussion Overall, these findings suggest ‘Coping with Voices’ is feasible, acceptable and worthwhile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"应对声音"小组的准对照试验结果。第2部分
摘要背景这是两篇论文中的第二篇,研究了一项名为“应对声音”的小组项目的有效性。第一篇论文报告了小组主持人执行该项目的经验。第二篇论文报告了参与者的研究结果。方法在61名知情同意参与研究的参与者中,19人没有参加一个小组,因此这提供了一个自然的准对照组。这项研究比较了参加一个小组的42名参与者在小学前和小学后的测量结果。29名与会者还提供了定性数据。对所有61名参与者进行了纵向测量。将参加该项目的个人与没有参加的个人进行比较。结果在参加《应对声音》的42名听力者中,可量化的数据显示,他们对声音的负面信念、声音的严重程度、对声音的痛苦和对声音力量的感知显著降低。参与者的反馈绝大多数都是积极的。次要指标显示,在12个月的随访中,团体参与者与非参与者相比,住院人数显著减少,基本生活技能有所提高。讨论总体而言,这些发现表明“应对声音”是可行的、可接受的和值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The impact of familial involvement on dropout in a culturally informed group therapy for people diagnosed with 'schizophrenia'. A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1