Evaluation of prevalence and characteristics of ponticulus posticus among Japanese adults: A comparative study between CBCT imaging and lateral cephalogram
{"title":"Evaluation of prevalence and characteristics of ponticulus posticus among Japanese adults: A comparative study between CBCT imaging and lateral cephalogram","authors":"Vajendra Joshi , Yukiko Matsuda , Yukinori Kimura , Kazuyuki Araki , Hideki Ishida","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2018.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and precise characteristics of ponticulus posticus (PP) among Japanese adults using CBCT<span>, and to evaluate the accuracy of PP by using the lateral cephalogram.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study consisted of lateral cephalogram and CBCT scans of 204 subjects (46 Males and 158 Females) above the age of 20 years. Prevalence and characteristics of PP was assessed. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>30 PP positive cases (14.7%) were defined by using CBCT. 12.7% subjects were assessed PP positive cases on lateral cephalogram. The accuracy of PP by using cephalogram was 0.89, sensitivity was 0.56 and specificity was 0.95.On CBCT assessment, there were 16 PP (7.8%) present on right side of Atlas whereas 23 PP (11.2%) were present on left side. Statistically significant difference was seen in the prevalence of left side PP. Among the 158 females 25 (15.8%) had PP whereas out of 46 males 5 (10.8%) had PP. No statistical significant differences were seen in gender and age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PP is quite a common finding in Japanese adults. There were cases in which PP was not detected on lateral cephalogram compared with CBCT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"77 2","pages":"Pages 134-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2018.04.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024117302406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose
Purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and precise characteristics of ponticulus posticus (PP) among Japanese adults using CBCT, and to evaluate the accuracy of PP by using the lateral cephalogram.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study consisted of lateral cephalogram and CBCT scans of 204 subjects (46 Males and 158 Females) above the age of 20 years. Prevalence and characteristics of PP was assessed. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.
Results
30 PP positive cases (14.7%) were defined by using CBCT. 12.7% subjects were assessed PP positive cases on lateral cephalogram. The accuracy of PP by using cephalogram was 0.89, sensitivity was 0.56 and specificity was 0.95.On CBCT assessment, there were 16 PP (7.8%) present on right side of Atlas whereas 23 PP (11.2%) were present on left side. Statistically significant difference was seen in the prevalence of left side PP. Among the 158 females 25 (15.8%) had PP whereas out of 46 males 5 (10.8%) had PP. No statistical significant differences were seen in gender and age groups.
Conclusion
PP is quite a common finding in Japanese adults. There were cases in which PP was not detected on lateral cephalogram compared with CBCT.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.