LAND REFORM AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - A SOUTH AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI:10.34111/IJEBEG.20191113
L. Muswaka
{"title":"LAND REFORM AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - A SOUTH AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE","authors":"L. Muswaka","doi":"10.34111/IJEBEG.20191113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land reform entails initiatives embodied in legislative, policy and other measures, constituting actions and mechanisms aimed at broadening access to land, improving security of tenure and restoring land or rights in land, all of which have become necessary because of the historical racial and inequitable approach to land in South Africa. Land reform therefore, consists of three main pillars, namely restitution of land rights, redistribution of land rights and improving security of a wide range of tenure forms. The focus of this paper is primarily on land tenure reform as an important element of land reform. The emphasis is on the legal arrangements used in South Africa to effect land tenure reform. The aim is to investigate the adequacy, flaws, challenges and effectiveness of the legal arrangements used in South Africa to effect land tenure reform. The qualitative method of research will be employed in this study. The reason is that it is best suited to this type of study which entails a critical analysis of legal issues. The study inter alia makes the finding that if land reform is pursued merely on the basis of political ideology and expediency, the economic and social costs will soon outstrip the perceived benefits of radical land acquisition. At the same time, it must however, be recognised that the majority have reasonable expectations for land holding patterns to change in order to address historical imbalances. The researcher concludes by submitting that property can no longer be seen, as it was defined in the common-law tradition, an island of sovereignty where the individual can do whatever she likes. Caution should be taken, therefore, in seeing property rights as the means by which to best secure tenure rights. Rather, security of tenure grounded in the human rights framework should be clearly articulated and properly seen as a fundamental human right.","PeriodicalId":37328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34111/IJEBEG.20191113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Land reform entails initiatives embodied in legislative, policy and other measures, constituting actions and mechanisms aimed at broadening access to land, improving security of tenure and restoring land or rights in land, all of which have become necessary because of the historical racial and inequitable approach to land in South Africa. Land reform therefore, consists of three main pillars, namely restitution of land rights, redistribution of land rights and improving security of a wide range of tenure forms. The focus of this paper is primarily on land tenure reform as an important element of land reform. The emphasis is on the legal arrangements used in South Africa to effect land tenure reform. The aim is to investigate the adequacy, flaws, challenges and effectiveness of the legal arrangements used in South Africa to effect land tenure reform. The qualitative method of research will be employed in this study. The reason is that it is best suited to this type of study which entails a critical analysis of legal issues. The study inter alia makes the finding that if land reform is pursued merely on the basis of political ideology and expediency, the economic and social costs will soon outstrip the perceived benefits of radical land acquisition. At the same time, it must however, be recognised that the majority have reasonable expectations for land holding patterns to change in order to address historical imbalances. The researcher concludes by submitting that property can no longer be seen, as it was defined in the common-law tradition, an island of sovereignty where the individual can do whatever she likes. Caution should be taken, therefore, in seeing property rights as the means by which to best secure tenure rights. Rather, security of tenure grounded in the human rights framework should be clearly articulated and properly seen as a fundamental human right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土地改革与可持续发展&南非视角
土地改革包括立法、政策和其他措施中体现的举措,包括旨在扩大获得土地的机会、改善保有权保障和恢复土地或土地权利的行动和机制,由于南非历史上对土地采取的种族和不公平的做法,所有这些都是必要的。因此,土地改革包括三个主要支柱,即归还土地权、重新分配土地权和改善各种保有权形式的安全。本文的重点主要是将土地保有制度改革作为土地改革的重要内容。重点是南非为实施土地保有权改革而采用的法律安排。目的是调查南非为实施土地保有权改革而采用的法律安排的充分性、缺陷、挑战和有效性。本研究将采用定性研究方法。原因是它最适合这种需要对法律问题进行批判性分析的研究。该研究发现,如果仅仅基于政治意识形态和权宜之计进行土地改革,经济和社会成本将很快超过激进征地的预期收益。然而,与此同时,必须认识到,大多数人对土地持有模式的改变抱有合理的期望,以解决历史上的不平衡问题。研究人员得出的结论是,财产再也看不见了,因为它是普通法传统中定义的,是一个主权岛,个人可以在这里为所欲为。因此,在将财产权视为最佳保障保有权的手段时,应谨慎行事。相反,以人权框架为基础的保有权保障应该得到明确阐述,并被适当地视为一项基本人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies
International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies is a peer-reviewed international journal published in English. It aims publishing high quality research studies in all sub-areas of Information Systems, Knowledge Management, eBusiness, eCommerce, eMarketing, mCommerce, eGovernment, ePublic Services, eGovernance etc. Being an international journal, the natural audience for the International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies includes academics, researchers, policy-makers, regulators, and practitioners. The journal is published by the Social Sciences Research Society.
期刊最新文献
Learning Geometry Online: A Creative Individual Learning Experience The Influence of Service Quality Dimensions On Customer Satisfaction Within Visa Facilitation Centres in South Africa Influence of Design Aesthetics and Brand Name On Generation Y Students’ Intention to Use Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices AN INVESTIGATION INTO SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY AN ASSESSMENT OF THE VALUE OF PMI AND MANUFACTURING SECTOR GROWTH IN PREDICTING OVERALL ECONOMIC OUTPUT (GDP) IN SOUTH AFRICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1