Fundamental elements of university-industry interaction from a grounded theory approach

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Innovation & Management Review Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1108/inmr-08-2021-0156
Rafaela Bürger, Gabriela Gonçalves Silveira Fiates
{"title":"Fundamental elements of university-industry interaction from a grounded theory approach","authors":"Rafaela Bürger, Gabriela Gonçalves Silveira Fiates","doi":"10.1108/inmr-08-2021-0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis work aims to analyze the university–industry interaction in innovation ecosystems. The problem under study addresses how agents can operate in university–industry interactions to enhance the connections, specifically in the aspect of operational mechanisms of an innovation ecosystem.Design/methodology/approachThe study is qualitative, applied through grounded theory approach, cross-sectional and multiple sources of evidence – semi-structured interviews were conducted. An explanatory conceptual model was subsequently compared with the literature and validated with specialists.FindingsThe results showed that the university–industry interaction is influenced by several factors, such as networking, legal support, facilitating agents, management practices. Despite this, some other factors were identified for the improvement of U–I relationships, such as: strengthening of triple helix, greater legal certainty and encouragement of open innovation.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size and the heterogeneity among the universities interviewed did not allow full saturation to occur. In spite of that, a significant level of saturation with respect to the challenges and barriers was observed.Practical implicationsThis work has a direct dialogue with researchers, managers and actors involved in university–industry interaction with regard to increasing the capacity for creation and dissemination of knowledge among organizations, educational institutions, government and companies.Originality/valueBy adopting a grounded theory approach, a detailed research agenda addresses research needs in two main areas: activities that precede the interaction between universities and companies, and the organization and management of the consequences of collaborative relationships.","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-08-2021-0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis work aims to analyze the university–industry interaction in innovation ecosystems. The problem under study addresses how agents can operate in university–industry interactions to enhance the connections, specifically in the aspect of operational mechanisms of an innovation ecosystem.Design/methodology/approachThe study is qualitative, applied through grounded theory approach, cross-sectional and multiple sources of evidence – semi-structured interviews were conducted. An explanatory conceptual model was subsequently compared with the literature and validated with specialists.FindingsThe results showed that the university–industry interaction is influenced by several factors, such as networking, legal support, facilitating agents, management practices. Despite this, some other factors were identified for the improvement of U–I relationships, such as: strengthening of triple helix, greater legal certainty and encouragement of open innovation.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size and the heterogeneity among the universities interviewed did not allow full saturation to occur. In spite of that, a significant level of saturation with respect to the challenges and barriers was observed.Practical implicationsThis work has a direct dialogue with researchers, managers and actors involved in university–industry interaction with regard to increasing the capacity for creation and dissemination of knowledge among organizations, educational institutions, government and companies.Originality/valueBy adopting a grounded theory approach, a detailed research agenda addresses research needs in two main areas: activities that precede the interaction between universities and companies, and the organization and management of the consequences of collaborative relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于扎根理论的大学与产业互动的基本要素
目的研究创新生态系统中的校企互动。本文研究的问题是,在创新生态系统的运行机制方面,代理人如何在校企互动中运作以增强联系。设计/方法/方法本研究是定性的,采用扎根理论方法,横断面和多种证据来源-进行了半结构化访谈。解释性概念模型随后与文献进行了比较,并与专家进行了验证。结果表明:校企互动受网络、法律支持、中介中介、管理实践等因素的影响。尽管如此,我们还发现了改善U-I关系的其他一些因素,例如:加强三螺旋结构、提高法律确定性和鼓励开放式创新。研究局限性/启示:样本量小,受访大学的异质性不允许完全饱和。尽管如此,在挑战和障碍方面观察到相当程度的饱和。实际意义这项工作与研究人员、管理人员和参与大学-产业互动的参与者进行了直接对话,以提高组织、教育机构、政府和公司之间的知识创造和传播能力。原创性/价值通过采用扎根的理论方法,详细的研究议程解决了两个主要领域的研究需求:大学和公司之间互动之前的活动,以及合作关系后果的组织和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Exploring Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 through the lens of country risk
IF 12 1区 管理学Technological Forecasting and Social ChangePub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122856
Abroon Qazi
Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in the Global Context
IF 1.8 3区 社会学Urban Policy and ResearchPub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2013.832667
R. Hu, E. Blakely, Yimin Zhou
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The nexus between management control systems, firm performance, green innovation and social media networking in Indonesian real estate companies Does eco-innovation lead to company growth? Dynamics of actors in innovation ecosystems' analytical structures Technological adoption: the case of PIX in Brazil HR innovation through inter-organizational HR collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1